The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

Arub · September 4, 2001, 05:58 PM

I have both a KP95DC and a KP944DC. Love them both. The 944 recoils just a bit, but not objectionable. Shoot 7" steel plates at 25 yards with both pistols. I favor the 944 judging from the saved brass. I had to drift the sights just a hair to the right on both. The P95 shoots center target at 25 yards if held at 6 O'clock point of aim. The P944 shoots poa/poi at 25 yards using 180 grain ammo. Shoots just slightly high using the 155 and 165 grain stuff. I keep with the 180 grain loads. Both pistols eat anything I feed them. Several thousand rounds through both. Never a lick of problems with the P95. Initially had ejection problems with the P944, Ruger replaced the ejector, no problems since the ejector replacement two years ago.

You can't go wrong with either.

September 4, 2001, 05:58 PM	#8
Arub Senior Member Join Date: January 20, 2001 Location: UCLA (upper corner of lower Alabama) Posts: 533	I have both a KP95DC and a KP944DC. Love them both. The 944 recoils just a bit, but not objectionable. Shoot 7" steel plates at 25 yards with both pistols. I favor the 944 judging from the saved brass. I had to drift the sights just a hair to the right on both. The P95 shoots center target at 25 yards if held at 6 O'clock point of aim. The P944 shoots poa/poi at 25 yards using 180 grain ammo. Shoots just slightly high using the 155 and 165 grain stuff. I keep with the 180 grain loads. Both pistols eat anything I feed them. Several thousand rounds through both. Never a lick of problems with the P95. Initially had ejection problems with the P944, Ruger replaced the ejector, no problems since the ejector replacement two years ago. You can't go wrong with either.