View Single Post
Old July 17, 2008, 03:49 PM   #18
xrocket
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2007
Posts: 549
SecDef

Thank you for your views on BHO response to the cause and effect of the Islamic terrorist attacks of 9/11. If you had taken the time to read the New Yorker article you would know these are his cited written words and were not paraphrased by myself or anyone else.

Nowhere have I condemned BHO in my post or used the word condemned as you state. Condemned is your word SecDef, which must be Freudian on your part. I stated my opinion and it stands; BHO should not be President of the United States of America. Obviously, we disagree, which is completely normal and to be expected. I did ask two questions which you cite: "Can you believe this man?" Which was rhetorical, and the second question, "With these intrinsic beliefs should BHO lead America and for that matter Western Civilization as we know it?"

I really expected someone to step forward and provide insight into why he should be elected President given his propensity for socialist apologies as regards Islamic terrorist attacking America and killing and wounding more than three thousand Innocent souls and I'm still waiting.

Using derogatory remarks directed toward me only confirms what I thought.
__________________
If you don't stand for something you'll fall for anything. My stand begins with "WE THE PEOPLE" ...
xrocket is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03832 seconds with 8 queries