The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

HOGGHEAD · September 9, 2008, 12:53 AM

John I agree with you somewhat. But the article says RedHawk-not Super RedHawk. And Super RedHawk is not referred to until the last line. Also I believe the author of the post has a RedHawk-Not a Super RedHawk. Or at least that is how his picture looks to me?? And the article says that there is separation at the frame and barrel connection-of the "Redhawk". Which as I stated was out before the GP100. So I stand by my criteque of the article, I do believe it is very misleading. But that is just my opininon. Tom.

September 9, 2008, 12:53 AM	#23
HOGGHEAD Senior Member Join Date: April 2, 2008 Location: Rivesville, WV Posts: 637	Wikipedia John I agree with you somewhat. But the article says RedHawk-not Super RedHawk. And Super RedHawk is not referred to until the last line. Also I believe the author of the post has a RedHawk-Not a Super RedHawk. Or at least that is how his picture looks to me?? And the article says that there is separation at the frame and barrel connection-of the "Redhawk". Which as I stated was out before the GP100. So I stand by my criteque of the article, I do believe it is very misleading. But that is just my opininon. Tom.