|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 22, 2009, 12:43 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2007
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 3,276
|
Quote:
|
|
April 22, 2009, 12:57 PM | #27 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: September 9, 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 958
|
Quote:
Quote:
There is such thing as tasteful open carry
__________________
And it's Killer Angel... as in the book |
||
April 22, 2009, 12:58 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
I find it very distressing that a police captain would publicly speak against a the law becusae he disagrees with it, can you imagine if he was publicly disaggring with another law? If he said "a law officer would have to be a moron not to aproach an individual who was covererd with tattoos/had a mohawk/black/white/mexican/had piercings without telling them to put their hands on their head" he would sliting his own throat, even though the guy with the pistol was doing nothing any more illegal than an individual who is covererd with tattoos/had a mohawk/black/white/mexican/had piercings. Also I would less suspisious of some one not trying to hide there weapon. makes me sick to here that cop talk:barf: |
|
April 22, 2009, 01:31 PM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: February 14, 2009
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 67
|
I voted Absolutley agree even though I disagree.
While I like the law allowing one to OC, I don't see why anyone would do so if their is an option to CC. Why make others nervous? And why show the bad guys your Ace in the hole? While if may deter a few, showing your weapon gives the bad guy the upper hand. Now along with your money he now has your gun. |
April 22, 2009, 01:41 PM | #30 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
See? Circular argument..... People stop open carry, making other people nervous when someone does open carry, making people say that people shouldn't open carry because it makes people nervous, so less people open carry, making it even more rare and making even more people nervous when somebody does it.... and on and on. Another point, I don't recall too many stories of BGs walking down the street with the pistol openly visible on their hip. BGs tend to hide their weapons until they plan to use them. It's a pretty safe bet that a person walking around with a visible handgun in a holster is either a cop or legally open carrying so what is it that makes people so nervous?
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
April 22, 2009, 02:07 PM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 9, 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 958
|
Quote:
Most people just think you're a cop. Ive never had a open carry incident, except maybe the time the girl at the register asked if it was a toy....
__________________
And it's Killer Angel... as in the book |
|
April 22, 2009, 02:08 PM | #32 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
If all you have to contribute to a thread is +1 in re: someone else's posts, use PM to tell them how much you appreciate them.
Posting just to give someone a +1 is a waste of bandwidth, and such posts stand a serious chance of being deleted.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
April 22, 2009, 03:27 PM | #33 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 5, 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 708
|
Voted yes and is at 91.1% yes
Last edited by Chuckusaret; April 22, 2009 at 03:34 PM. |
April 22, 2009, 03:39 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 15, 2009
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,717
|
Interesting that 91% of the respondents voted "absolutely" but it still created such a stir.
I do believe in the right to carry, but it comes down to being practical. I'm glad that some folks have the time and patience to cause an incident just to remind the general public that we do have these rights. In my own life though, it's just simpler to avoid walking around with a firearm when it might cause an incident. Who needs that hassle? It's a sad commentary on our society though to think that 30 years ago I could have walked down the street toting my rifle or handgun in plain sight and nobody would have given it a second thought here in my town. But now, when I do carry a rifle or handgun down the street for even a block to go to my local gun shop for a trade or gunsmithing, I get a lot of odd stares, wondering if I'm some maniac who will shoot up the town. |
April 22, 2009, 03:48 PM | #35 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 25, 2006
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,719
|
Voted yes.
I am one of the "morons" who open carries 95% of the time. A right not exercised is a right lost. BTW, Indiana does not respect the right to carry a concealed weapon. They require a fee to be paid for a licnese. That does not make carrying a concealed weapon a right, it makes it a priviledge that you pay money to the state for their permission. I don't blame the guy at all for carrying a recorder, I am thinking about getting one myself. http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum55/23861.html BTW, the US Supreme Court has ruled that an anonymous tip regarding a MWAG is no grounds for even a Terry stop when no suspicion of criminal activity present. A lawfully carried firearm is not a basis for suspicion of criminal activity, IE: unlawful possession of that firearm by a felon, etc. |
April 22, 2009, 04:11 PM | #36 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 25, 2006
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,719
|
Here's another "moron":
http://www.wisn.com/news/19235901/detail.html I think this comment sums it up: "This is America. If we don't stand up for our rights, you know, what are we doing here? What have people fought and died for? Why'd we found this country?" Krause said. And, let me pose this question: What if a group of people stands up and exclaims, "We are afraid for our lives because this state allows people to carry concealed weapons and we are afraid because we don't know who has a gun and who doesn't!" Obviously, by the same reasoning stated against open carrying, because it scares people, we should then just stop carrying concealed and ban concealed carry permits. And if you don't think that won't happen, look at the current state of licensed concealed carry in National Parks. Last edited by NavyLT; April 22, 2009 at 04:48 PM. |
April 22, 2009, 04:18 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 24, 2009
Location: RGV, Tx
Posts: 787
|
If the gun is in a holster and is openly carried then you should assume that he is doing so legally. BG are not going to carry a gun on there hip in the open. If a bg is going to be carrying a gun in the open chances are its in there hand and about to be pointed at someone and fired.
__________________
And death climbs the steps one by one, To give you the rose that's been burnt by her son, Point me to the sky above I can't get there on my own, Walk me through the graveyard Dig up her bones |
April 22, 2009, 04:57 PM | #38 | |
Member
Join Date: February 14, 2009
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
|
|
April 22, 2009, 05:06 PM | #39 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 25, 2006
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,719
|
Quote:
http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum6/24827.html Why do you think criminals like to frequent places with no gun signs? |
|
April 22, 2009, 05:20 PM | #40 | |
Member
Join Date: February 14, 2009
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
|
|
April 22, 2009, 05:22 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 24, 2009
Location: RGV, Tx
Posts: 787
|
Also with this poll how many people here voted on it that don't live in Ohio?
I don't think the news station ever thought people from Wyoming and Texas and across the country would vote.
__________________
And death climbs the steps one by one, To give you the rose that's been burnt by her son, Point me to the sky above I can't get there on my own, Walk me through the graveyard Dig up her bones |
April 22, 2009, 05:27 PM | #42 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
I would say it depends on the intelligence of the criminal at hand, and god knows this nation is burdened with criminal of pitifully weak intelligence.
Every once in awhile you hear the ones about criminals who try to rob gun stores. Or, they'll walk right past a police car in a convenience store parking lot, look at the police officer drinking a cup of coffee, and then try to rob the place. Or, my all time favorite, the one from the 1970s where two brain dead idiots decided to rob a cop bar somewhere in the mid west. They figured that there were a lot of cops in the bar spending money, so the cash register should be filled... Yow.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
April 22, 2009, 05:44 PM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 17, 2009
Posts: 385
|
I think, (THINK tuttle, im not the prophet you seem to think I am) the presence of an openly carried firearm would dissuade a bg, unless he was going in with intent to kill someone. If all he wanted was the money, he is going to see the gun, and know that either way someone is getting shot, and most will want to avoid the hassle. I am all for CC in the city, and OC when I am outdoors. People who are out doing recreational things like hiking usually wont give you a second look when you have a gun. I am all for CC in the city because of most of the points here. 1: If the guy is willing to shoot someone and he sees you before you see him, your gonna be the first on his list 2: If he is dissuaded by it, it does not necessarily mean he is not just going to move on the next restraunt, better for him to try something with you there where you might be able to prevent a violent crime.
|
April 22, 2009, 06:04 PM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 24, 2009
Location: RGV, Tx
Posts: 787
|
I was looking on the darwin awards where some idiot walked around 2 squad cars into a gun store waved I believe it was a .22 handgun and ended up with 21 holes in him from 7 different weapons and 40 or 50 some odd shell casing on the ground.
And you know some one was going man I want all that brass to reload
__________________
And death climbs the steps one by one, To give you the rose that's been burnt by her son, Point me to the sky above I can't get there on my own, Walk me through the graveyard Dig up her bones |
April 22, 2009, 06:13 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 606
|
I strongly agree with cracked91, we all argue a lot about a bg targeting the armed person first or not, and we tend to lose sight of the fact that there is more than one type of BG if said BG is looking for a fight he would certanitly take out the armed individual first, it's probably true most BG's are not looking for a fight , but if we were the type of people that played everything according to the percentages none of would carry firearms to begin with.
just my humble opinion |
April 22, 2009, 07:13 PM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 11, 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 507
|
When people open carry apparance could be a huge factor on public reaction.Example a guy OC with dress shirt and slacks vs OC with jeans and T-shirt.stereotype folks among the public.
__________________
Dave. |
April 22, 2009, 07:25 PM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 606
|
I have a (tattoo) sleeve on one arm and a lot of the other arm covered as well and have noticed that even at the range i get looks like I shouldn't be carrying a gun so I would have to agree with you there
__________________
We must, indeed, all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately. Last edited by Housezealot; April 22, 2009 at 07:57 PM. |
April 22, 2009, 07:54 PM | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 13, 2008
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 313
|
I voted yes, only because that state law prohibits concealed carry and does permit open carry. Whether excellent judgment was exercised or not, state law gave him the right to do so...(Assuming the info is correct)....
To allow ANY citizen to open carry versus allowing law abiding individuals to APPLY for a concealed weapons permit that involves an extensive background check, including FBI screening, seems ridiculous to me....I agree with everyone who states that open carry is an invitation for trouble, with the already noted exceptions, including carry on your own land, etc.... Just allowing "bad guys" to be able to size you up in advance is reason enough to not open carry, in my opinion. Chances are, they will be carrying CONCEALED.... EVERYONE should not be allowed to carry a weapon, however it is carried.... Proper screening and certification is the very least any state can do to both enforce Constitutional Rights and Public Safety..... |
April 22, 2009, 08:48 PM | #49 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 5, 2009
Posts: 167
|
Quote:
http://www.ag.state.oh.us/le/prevention/concealcarry/index.asp He had the chance to carry concealed, this wasn't about that though as evidenced by him having a tape recorder ready, he was out to make a show and he did. Quote:
The reason why Joe Blow cares about open carry is because he doesn't have any way to tell if the person is Joey the recently released felon or just your typical twit out to throw his weight around and carry a big gun on his belt to compensate for the lack of a big gun below his belt. The police also do not have any way to tell who the person carrying the weapon is. If you open carry in inappropriate places, regardless of it's legality, you very likely will be braced, ordered to the ground, and suffer through having your weapon removed and held until they can ascertain you are in fact legal. The reason the copper said what he did, is because they can't let you keep your gun while they run your info because they don't know if they are standing next to Joey the released felon, running his info to see if he is supposed to be armed or not, while Joey still has his weapon on him. Open carry has it's uses and it's place. When you have other alternatives that better suit the situation, use them. There are better ways to acclimate the public to firearms than scaring people in a public demonstration that just makes you look like a fool. Open carry does not = responsible gun owner. It can just as easily = perp going on a shooting rampage. If someone strides into the mall open carrying a weapon, for at least me, that is going to be cause for me to go on alert, and they sure better not make any poorly chosen actions. |
||
April 22, 2009, 08:56 PM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 606
|
I also don't belive it is wise to open carry, but I fear the idea of legislating common sense, it is a slippery slope, thats like pulling some one over becuse they have a corvette and the ability to do 150 (yeah I know it's not the same) when we start justifing violation of personal rights is when we start moving into a police state.
I don't mean to argue with you trooper, so I'll stop now I do not agree with what you are saying; but I will die defending your right to say it. ...
__________________
We must, indeed, all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately. |
|
|