September 15, 2021, 05:56 PM | #101 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2015
Posts: 162
|
RC 20, you assumed that I shoot 10 rounds in one quick motion, and you assumed that I take 10 shoots to hit a target.
If you would try a ten shoot group you will find a tight group some where near the center of your overall group, that is where your ammo hits, that is where your rifle is shooting. The group will look like your data, several close numbers, and both high and low outliers, but with 10 you will see the center of your group. The extremes won't point that out, and a three shoot group won't either. By lowering my SD, and it took paying attention to everything assumed, my groups will run in the .25 MOA. |
September 16, 2021, 03:29 PM | #102 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
Ok, guilty.
Equally then my 9 shots work as well though for hunting I don't care about SD and ES of 60 gets me 1 inch or a tad lower. I never shot any animal off a bench (well I did rest on the hood of my Pickup once)
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
September 16, 2021, 03:40 PM | #103 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,620
|
Quote:
But if you come across an outlier like that in a match or when lined up on a trophy buck, it is all yours. |
|
September 16, 2021, 06:15 PM | #104 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
|
My first experiment with the Shotmarker is causing me to rethink the ES/SD thing. Two ten round groups is hardly proof, but my early evidence is indicating that shots fired at close to the same velocity are impacting at close to the same vertical POI at 300 yards, which rules out my barrel harmonics theory. Next week I want to run a more detailed test with 4 ten round groups and compare my optical chrono to the Shotmarker numbers. I found out today I can really secure the SM target to our range target stands really securely and am curious to see if the numbers correlate.
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek |
September 18, 2021, 10:43 PM | #105 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
Quote:
And testing is where you can throw it out (and I was testing), competition you make darned sure to double check your powder levels. In this case (pun) I wanted to see what factory velocities were. 200 fps low does not tell me that. throwing it out does. Data is not a blind thing. Gathering it serves a purpose. In this case it was not to do quality control check on factory but see what velocity they load to. In my case I don't mess up in the above 2800 fps area in any of my guns. It was interesting to see that the factory 130 gr did indeed meet the velocity listed for those loads (3000 something). That is a cross check with my Chronograph as well.
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not Last edited by RC20; September 19, 2021 at 01:16 PM. |
|
September 18, 2021, 10:53 PM | #106 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
I have some data on a good load and the results. As expected, the Chrono data backed up the results.
In this case at 105 yards, I put 10 rounds of 6.5 x 47 into a half inch. One raged hole (granted a larger one than the term usually means) As it was all the same load and no adjusting on the COAL, I took data on all 10 rounds. ES: 35 SD: 12 (Average Velocity was 2660. As Hounddawg says, its the group that counts but if you want data that gives you a half and MOA, then that is what it looks like. The numbers reflect good quality control, the testing found the spot it likes. Now if the hole was 1 inch, then you know your quality is good, its just the velocity is not in the node the gun shoots well in. I have crossed more than one load powder wise to match a velocity and it shot well plus or minus a bit at that velocity. 35 fps is pushing the limits as to what you can achieve (25 fps being implausible) and the SD at 1/3 the ES speaks for itself reflecting a good load. I can't say enough about the 6.5 for that type of testing (with a very nice target trigger). It allows you to virtually eliminate recoil aspects and focus on the sight picture and the squeeze. The NF scope with the dot is an assist as you can hold and see a very small spot easily.
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
October 4, 2021, 08:18 AM | #107 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,130
|
Meant to get back to this sooner.
The issue with ES vs SD is that SD varies less. If you shoot either nine or ten shot groups or strings, the average ES will be about three times the SD, but (within 95% confidence) 21 out of 22 groups or strings will have the ES vary about ±25%, while the SD will vary only about ±8%. So if you want a number that is representative of what to expect from future nine or ten-shot groups, you get better accuracy and consistency multiplying the SD by three than you do from using the ES number directly. Another way to look at it is, if your particular group happened to include an outlier, multiplying the SD by three lowers the effect that one outlier has on your result by a factor of the square root of nine or ten, whichever number of rounds you used. Note that the factor of three only applies to nine or ten shot samples. For five-shot groups the multiplier is two-and-a-third. For thirty-shot groups, the multiplier is four. This is in the plot I posted earlier of group size or velocity extreme spread growth with the number of shots in a sample. As far as the group center goes, it moves around from group-to-group too. The SD of that change in mean value is called the standard error and is equal to the SD divided by the square root of the sample size. In other words, for any given SD, the center moves around more for small groups with that SD than for large ones because that SD divided by the square root of the sample size is a smaller number for large samples.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
October 5, 2021, 03:19 PM | #108 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
And I thought my brain hurt before.
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
October 5, 2021, 03:33 PM | #109 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 1,419
|
Wait until you have explain to someone why a "bell curve" from a Cauchy distribution is not the same as "bell curve" from a Normal distribution and the general rules based on the Normal curve no longer apply.
__________________
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ All data is flawed, some just less so. |
October 5, 2021, 04:34 PM | #110 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
After you've found an accurate load, will someone else shoot it to the same level with your rifle and ammo?
|
October 5, 2021, 06:13 PM | #111 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,882
|
Quote:
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive ! I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again . |
|
October 5, 2021, 07:39 PM | #112 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
|
The obsession with numbers gives me a chuckle. Last week at my range one of our regulars was "testing" ammo. Now keep in mind this guy is one of our top shooters and and is usually in the top three places in both mid and long range. As I was waiting on cold range and unpacking I asked him how it was going. He was all upset because something was just not right, looking at his target he was getting .5 to .75 MOA 10 round groups at 800 yards. I pointed out his groups were fine, he said yeah but my SD is way too high. I asked him if the next match was a chrono match to see whose ammo had the best numbers or would we be shooting at targets. He just gave me a puzzled look. For whatever it is worth I think he is still all worried about his chrono numbers
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek |
October 5, 2021, 09:49 PM | #113 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,130
|
It applies to group size stats as well. Or should I chuckle because those are just numbers, too?
The underlying point is that if you are going to measure shooting results, you are going to get numbers. The question is, what do you want to do with them or what do you want them to tell you? That's what should drive your choices in stats. For example, I've frequently used velocity SD as an indicator of ignition consistency. By itself, it may make little to no difference at short ranges or at a range where the trajectories cross, especially not off the bench. But in position shooting or in cold weather, that may change. So consistency seems desirable.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
October 6, 2021, 12:46 AM | #114 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
|
well Nick like I told "John" when they start having chrono matches I will start sweating the ES/SD numbers. Until then I just worry about the groups size numbers. If I could perform as consistently well in competition as "John" does I would not give a darn if my ES was 4 digits. For the record I don't sweat the shininess index numbers of my brass either.
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek |
October 6, 2021, 08:44 AM | #115 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2009
Location: Butte, MT
Posts: 2,627
|
Quote:
__________________
A clinger and deplorable, MAGA, and life NRA member. When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. Single Action .45 Colt (Sometimes colloquially referred to by its alias as the .45 'Long' Colt or .45LC). Don't leave home without it. That said, the .44Spec is right up their too... but the .45 Colt is still the king. |
|
October 6, 2021, 10:32 AM | #116 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
|
Quote:
[edit] might just be my public school education but I cannot find any correlation between ES/SD and group sizes or group verticals at all [/edit] Which load would you choose to develop? 27.3, 25.8 or 28.0 ? I ended up going with 28.1 gns when the composite of 28.0 and 28.2 showed a POI of .402 height with a 95% CEP of .312 . That allows subtle changes in powder charge weight or temperature variations to have a minimal effect on the overall POI
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek Last edited by hounddawg; October 6, 2021 at 04:55 PM. |
|
October 6, 2021, 02:31 PM | #117 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 23, 2017
Posts: 239
|
Ten shots - some pundits claim 7 shots is statistically as valid - would be more than adequate, IMHO. However I've found 5 shots tell me all I really need to know. Five shot groups are cheaper than 7 or 10.
__________________
Young guys should hang out with old guys; old guys know stuff. |
October 6, 2021, 02:44 PM | #118 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
|
two is all you really need for elimination, three at the most. If the first two are beyond what group size (or ES if that is your thing) you are striving for then more shots will not bring them closer together
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek |
October 6, 2021, 03:56 PM | #119 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
Quote:
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
|
October 6, 2021, 04:03 PM | #120 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
Quote:
On a practical note, I found a totally full 1 lb jug of Varget with a hand label with a ? on it. Ok, its the right size and color, but is it really Varget? Hmm, what to do. I am far from desperate as I have at least 5lb of Varget but..... Mixing with other is a bad idea until you know. Ponder. Ok, I have been doing quite a bit of 33.6 gr (known Varget) with Lap 120-L bullets so I have a good FPS Data set. Load up 5, see how they compare to the data set. Close and yes its Varget almost for sure, but also that sub batch test will tell me how close top the known Varget it performs at and does it need to be adjusted +/-? Use it up and carry on.
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
|
October 6, 2021, 05:40 PM | #121 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,130
|
Just to add to Houndawg's point about velocity at 100 yards, with his bullet going 3000 fps, a 100 fps velocity change amounts to about 0.17 moa of vertical change in POI from a perfectly rigid gun.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
October 6, 2021, 06:35 PM | #122 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
|
Quote:
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek Last edited by hounddawg; October 7, 2021 at 06:55 AM. |
|
October 7, 2021, 12:08 PM | #123 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,130
|
Yet, you don't believe that if the 28.9-grain load also had an ES of 8 and an SD of 4 that it would necessarily become bigger. More importantly, if the ES and SD numbers for the two groups were flipped, you wouldn't be jumping up and down and saying that tight ES was the key to accuracy, because, as your actual numbers show, velocity is not the dominant term influencing precision here. But trying to see these things is how confusion in our efforts arises. We have to isolate variables from one another to see their effects independently.
Incidentally, I accidentally copied the windage number for gusting 5-7 from 90° at 100 yards when I meant to describe drop. That windage effect over a 2 mph difference is what is the tiny moa. If the gun barrel were perfectly rigid, you would get a drop of over a 100 fps difference of about .17 moa. That's more like what I've calculated in the past. I patched the posts to reflect the correction. But these two numbers are further evidence you are seeing the effects of muzzle vibration in response to recoil moments and pressure distortion. A really common thing to see is a vibration that switches between vertical and horizontal ellipses as the barrel time shifts, having minimum area (smallest CEP) in the transition between these two extremes, where it is circular. So I looked at your target and saw it seemed predominantly wide at the low charges, gaining some vertical, but also some width in the middle (a bad precision node to my way of thinking) and then back to predominantly horizontal (wide) again at the end. What I look for in that sort of situation is where the two trends crossover, as that is likely to be an area minimus for both modes. In the plot below, you can see the vertical has a couple of apparent flat spots. One between 26.4 and 26.8 grains and the other at 28.0 and 28.2 grains. In both instances, the horizontal dispersion range crosses them over at about 26.6 grains and 28.1 grains. So I would try those two loads.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
October 7, 2021, 03:32 PM | #124 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
|
I am not concerned with the horizontals during the initial testing. The G1 BC of that bullet is .255 and according to JBM calculator a full force 5 MPH wind would move the bullet .5 inches. Now I shoot over flags a lot so I have seen updrafts, downdrafts, swirls etc on the range.
Just out of curiosity Nick did you plot the ES in relation to the vertical, I did not myself because just at a glance there is no correlation. I ended up loading at 28.1 gns. It is just a practice load for 300 yards but is remarkably accurate, (relatively) cheap to load, and conserves my Varget
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek |
October 8, 2021, 11:25 AM | #125 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,130
|
Yah, I messed up. I used Didion's formula for deflection of the difference between 5 and 7 fps then forgot to convert feet to inches. I also was going too fast and didn't note your wind was shifting from side to straight ahead.
That blue line is the ES in vertical. The wind probably explains a good portion of the horizontal in the middle of the plot. But what I am seeing that mainly caught my eye is the shift in vertical from middle to low to high and back down again, and that is suggestive of the muzzle vibration shifting in and out of a vertical mode. The Horizontal, either side of the center, appeared to be running opposite the vertical, which is what suggested you may have the vibration modes trading off over time. But separating the horizontal vibration from the wind is tough. You could try the two charge weights I suggested where the lines cross. But if the vibration is all vertical and the wind is doing all the horizontal, then you want to go back to 25.8 and 28.6 when the wind isn't blowing.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
|
|