|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 30, 2024, 03:45 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
First time ever shooting Lapua X-act and Long Range--bad news for all the other manufacturers!
I've never shot these 22lr offerings from Lapua--mainly because I've never seen them available. So when they popped up at Creedmoor sports a few days ago, I said why not, I already spend big bucks on premium RWS and Eley ammo, I'll give em a shot (pun intended).
Yesterday was a bit breezy here in coastal Maine--winds gusting to over 50 mph; but today the sun came out for the first time in recent memory and the winds backed off to a more reasonable 15 to 25 mph. Normally I wouldn't even consider shooting match grade ammo in anything over a few mph occasional puff, but I was burning with curiosity. I set up my target box with a left-over practice target on it and anchored it with a big stone at 53 yds, the prevailing wind direction coming from my 8:00; my technique came down to choosing to fire when the box stopped rocking back and forth. This group is the very first 10 shots of X-Act I've ever fired, I was very pleasantly surprised by how well it fired in the wind, I'm going to have to rethink that as one of my primary excuses for not shooting in windier conditions! Actually the measured group is 9 shots--the one to the right I'm calling a flier due to not getting the shot off before the box rock and rolled again. Team Lapua--sign me up!
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
March 30, 2024, 06:00 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,334
|
I realize this is a post about the ammunition but, just curious, what rifle were you using?
|
March 30, 2024, 06:18 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 925
|
Stagpanther,
Great shooting in the wind, by the way. Your results confirm what I have measured. Quite a number of years ago, I splurged and bought a four boxes of X-Act after falling in love with Lapua Center-X and Midas Plus bullets after comparing 58 different bullet offerings in 7 .22lr rifles. I mostly shot over 48,685 rounds - 9,737 measured 5-round groups with my 7 rifles and 10 rifles belonging to 3 of my friends. At 50 Yards: My Cooper 57M managed to average under 0.4 inches with 9 ammos and X-Act averaged 0.330. The Kidd managed to average under 0.4 inches with 8 ammos and X-Act averaged 0.339. I admit that I have done most of my shooting at 50 yards with 7 different .22lr rifles. At 100 yds: To measure the difference in the best bullets, I used X-Act with my Cooper 57M and my Kidd semi at 100 yards since I had concluded that a .22lr bullets accuracy was tested best at 100 yards because the best bullets were significantly more accurate at 100 yards. My belief was that the quality control of the high-grade match bullets made the difference. With the Cooper, X-act averaged just over .6 of an inch at 100 yards. I was never considered an expert at reading the wind. That Cooper averaged just under 0.8 with Tenex and exactly 0.8 with Center-X. The Cooper overall average with 6 bullets other than X-Act was 0.85 for 89 groups. With the Kidd, X-Act averaged .74 of an inch at 100 yards. The Kidd averaged 0.84 with Center-X. The Kidd overall average with 7 bullets other than X-Act was 0.88 for 209 groups, including some mid-brands like SK and Wolf. Back then, X-Act cost $26 a box. I have no idea what it costs now. I decided that for my .22LR shooting I would stick to Center-X and have since shot through two cases. Not quite as accurate as X-Act but a lot cheaper and more within my budget. From my testing Lapua .22lr bullets seem to set the standard for accuracy. In a couple of rifles with tight chambers, Eley Tenex gives Lapua a run for the money, but across all 7 of my rifles, Lapua shoots consistently better in all of them, while the high-end Eley Tenex and Match seem to have issues with more than half of my rifles, probably because the seem to prefer tighter chambered rifles. |
March 30, 2024, 06:40 PM | #4 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
||
March 31, 2024, 04:15 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
|
March 31, 2024, 09:05 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,278
|
Thanks for posting, stagpanther. I was looking at that the other day. I blew my discretionary wad on new optics for my .22 lr and .30-30 this paycheck. I'll have to wait for the next payday.
I don't have a match chamber, but my little Bergara BMR does pretty well. We're expecting high winds and red flag fire watch today. So I won't go test my new optics, and just enjoy Easter Sunday with my family.
__________________
NRA Life Member |
March 31, 2024, 09:08 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,278
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member |
|
March 31, 2024, 09:56 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
Quote:
All that said, she's still a honey of a shooter. The only things that aren't stock are the chassis and yodave spring job--otherwise she's a true blue CZ 457 action/barrel with conventional add-ons. The Leupold vx5 HD doesn't hurt, either.
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
|
March 31, 2024, 10:56 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,471
|
Stop making me want to try the expensive stuff. I can't afford to actually shoot it.
Between the boy and I, we shoot about 300-500 rounds per month in the match rifles. If testing of a new configuration is required, or a high round count match is involved, that easily doubles.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
March 31, 2024, 11:19 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,334
|
Quote:
|
|
March 31, 2024, 12:31 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
From hero...to zero : (
Well--went out again today since it was nice and sunny, but the winds were such that where I shoot I was forced to shoot into a quartering headwind of 10 to 15 mph; a swirling mess basically. I was kinda of on a high from yesterday's results and was thinking (praying) maybe the x-act perhaps was more impervious to headwinds/crosswinds. It was not--or at least not by very much, compared to the other ammos I shot out of my rifle.
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
March 31, 2024, 12:38 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
|
March 31, 2024, 12:42 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,930
|
Hey Panther. Did you try doping the wind at all? The group should be much smaller without the wind. Good shootin'.
-TL Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
March 31, 2024, 12:47 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
|
March 31, 2024, 12:57 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
|
March 31, 2024, 01:37 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 925
|
Stagpanther,
One thing about Lapua .22lr ammo - I don't think lot numbers are all that significant. I bought a case of Center-X about 10 years ago and it shot really good. That was when you could order a couple of boxes of several lots from Champions Shooter Supply and then pick the best lot and they would send you a case. When I asked them about doing that with Lapua ammo, they laughed and said no one does that with Lapua. After I had two boxes left out of the case of Center-X. I reordered another case. When the new case arrived, I took the two boxes left from the old case and two boxes from the new case and my Cooper 57M and went to the range and shot the four boxes at 50 yards. The averages from 20 groups from the old case and the 20 groups from the new case were 0.001 different. That is essentially statistically insignificant. CSS was right - different lots, even years apart, don't seem to matter to Lapua. |
March 31, 2024, 02:00 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,930
|
Quote:
My cheap rifle/ammo shoots about the same size of group at 50yd WITHOUT wind. If I were to shoot my rifle where you were, the group would probably be 0.85moa. just some useless thoughts. -TL Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
|
March 31, 2024, 02:47 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
Here's an interesting data point to ponder: RWS rates their R 100 @ 1130 fps (just above where a projectile breaks the sound barrier).
Out of my jaguar's 28" barrel I always get the supersonic crack when I fire R 100-- theoretically max velocity is generally attained at 16 to 18" in the bore for 22lr.
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! Last edited by stagpanther; March 31, 2024 at 02:53 PM. |
March 31, 2024, 04:13 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,930
|
The crack may be the gas exiting the muzzle.
-TL Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
March 31, 2024, 06:00 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
|
March 31, 2024, 06:03 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
|
March 31, 2024, 09:18 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,471
|
Quote:
I have seen enough decrease in group size with subsonic ammo in 20-25" barrels, vs 16-19", to at least partially agree with the "universal fact" that 24" is best. The groups do seem to "calm" down a bit, and vertical stringing is reduced. But with HV ammo, it doesn't seem to matter. The only differences that I've really seen are a little more reach (flatter trajectory), and possibly less vertical stringing. It looks like I am going to need to run my backup rifle, the 18" 10/22 in this month's X match (for various reasons). With advertised ranges being "long" on average, and out to 300 yd, I am seriously considering working up all new dope with Blazer 40 gr RN. That scope only has about 36 MoA of elevation left and only a few subtensions in the reticle (2.3, 5.3, 8.8, and 12 MoA). With CCI SV, I need about 46 MoA to make 300 yd. But with Blazer 40 gr RN, I can get to 300 yd by dialing 36 MoA.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
April 1, 2024, 12:12 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
|
April 1, 2024, 06:07 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,975
|
Franken--what is an x match? when I google it all I get is spreadsheet functions.
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
April 1, 2024, 10:49 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,471
|
Those groups would be more than acceptable.
Not bad. -------------------- NRL22X. NRL22 on steroids. (And for championship points, but I'm not at that level.) Longer ranges. Smaller targets. Harder stages. Higher round counts. Shorter time limits. Difficult props and shooting positions. Blind stages. Unknown distance stages. Stages with crippling gear limitations. Whatever else a match director can dream up. And overall longer matches. (8-10 hours, or more; vs 2-4 for normal NRL22) This match says they are only shooting to 300 yd. But it is not uncommon for longer ranges to be encountered. The X match that our club held last year, for example, went to ~420 yards. Even with a better scope and base, I had to "max out" elevation and hold 22 MoA in the reticle. (I never shoot with a scope adjustment against its stop. "Maxing out" elevation, for me, means hitting the stop and backing off a few MoAs/Mils.)
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
|