The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 22, 2002, 01:29 PM   #1
1911greg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 14, 2002
Posts: 196
gun registration

does the state government know how many guns you own and what types, do they have like a data base where they can type in your name, social security and figure out what makes and models you own? If so why did they implement assualt weapon registration.
1911greg is offline  
Old February 22, 2002, 07:48 PM   #2
graystar
Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2002
Posts: 92
only the state that require registration

The form that you fill out when you buy a gun is kept by the store you bought from. They call you in, but no information about the gun is passed.

If you have a concealed weapons license, you don't even need to call in cause you are "pre-qualified".

The records must be kept for 20 years. After that they can be thrown away. I think that if a place goes out of business, the records must be sent to the feds.

Now, if your state requires registration of firearms, then they will know what you have. Sometimes a state doesn't require registration but a municipality does. For example, in NYS you don't need to register rifles, but in NYC you do.
graystar is offline  
Old February 22, 2002, 08:35 PM   #3
biere
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: tn
Posts: 504
A search on the 911 fallout would help. Ashcroft denied the fbi or whomever access to records of who bought firearms. There really aren't supposed to be records of that, they have to destroy them after 90 days or so maybe. I forget.

After lots of research, I decided I can not prove either way who is doing what. If concerned, get firearms that involve no paperwork if legal. If unconcerned, enjoy life and carry on.

I vote for both.
biere is offline  
Old February 23, 2002, 03:22 AM   #4
madmike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 5, 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 559
if/when they bring me a list of weapons, by type and serial number, that they wish me to register, I will do so.

Obviously, any weapon not on the list doesn't exist, and I can't register what doesn't exist.

Obviously, since all weapons mfrd after June 1 1968 have serial numbers, there are no weapons without serial numbers.

__________________
FORGED IN BLOOD, (editor), Sept 2017, Baen Books
THE TIDE OF BATTLE, July 2018, Baen Books
http://www.MichaelZWilliamson.com
http://www.SharpPointyThings.com
madmike is offline  
Old February 23, 2002, 01:39 PM   #5
biere
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: tn
Posts: 504
Of course I have actually traded some, and I might be selling one or two that kind of duplicate stuff.

Until everytransfer is required to be papered, it will be hard to know who has what without busting in the door and searching things with metal detecors.
biere is offline  
Old February 23, 2002, 04:18 PM   #6
Oakleaf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2001
Location: Central Scotland and the Highlands
Posts: 164
Those who have not done so, please refer to my posts on the UK position.

Registration is the bed rock of the mentality that says you need permission to have a firearm. Can be made to sound extremely reasonable etc. But if you lose that one, the rest WILL follow.

Hard on it's heels is good reason - you need no reason to exercise a right. If a reason is applied it becomes, by that definition, something other than a right.
Oakleaf is offline  
Old February 23, 2002, 05:23 PM   #7
deej
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2002
Location: Silicon Valley, (Occupied) California Republic
Posts: 226
Forward traces

Is the BATF still doing forward traces?

You know, they show up at an FFL for their unannounced, warrantless inspection that FFLs are forced to agree to, look at the 4473s for firearms they consider to be naughty (handguns, EBRs, 22s, etc), and make sure that none of the owners of those firearms are naughty.

DJ
__________________
"Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument."

- Chief Justice Marshall, Marbury v. Madison
deej is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04806 seconds with 10 queries