February 19, 2009, 11:34 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 3, 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,421
|
The point may be moot, but any plans on barrier tests?
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" --commonly misattributed to, and most likely not, Benjamin Franklin |
February 19, 2009, 01:34 PM | #27 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2008
Posts: 10
|
> The point may be moot, but any plans on barrier tests?
Previously, it was reported that DRT acts like FMJ on lumber and water jugs. I might have a chance to try some barrier testing but, as you can see from the dates on my posts, I don't have much time to "play" these days. > Any ammo that advertises that its wounding depth is 5" is way too shallow in the penetration department for my comfort. You can judge from the photos but it looks like I got more like 8" and 10" from my two rounds. Depends on whether you measure the end of the visible "tendrils." It's still far less than the OTM round, but I think I remember a claim that a cat is supposed to stop a DRT bullet. (Maybe not a housecat but looks like a bobcat might stop it. ) But penetration isn't everything. Wound size matters too. Everyone can decide for themselves if my results mean anything. From what I've read previously, the frangible ammo used for metal targets does not behave the same way DRT behaved in my tests, so sorry some forum readers are yawning here! Frangible ammo normally will NOT come apart in gelatin but DRT does come apart. The tip of the bullet can be "tuned" to come apart at whatever energy level the designer desires and it appears the energy level is lower for DRT for hunting and defensive applications. I know I'm simplifying here. Somewhere on this site, http://www.tacticalshotgun.ca/conten...eparation.html they tested "normal" frangible ammo in gelatin and it did not come apart. I don't have time to find the exact page right now but I was inspired by their methods and results. -Cal |
February 19, 2009, 01:39 PM | #28 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2008
Posts: 10
|
Found it!
http://www.tacticalshotgun.ca/conten...frangible.html (Keep in mind it's a .308.) a kill: http://www.tacticalshotgun.ca/conten...ble_308_a.html and other tests: http://www.tacticalshotgun.ca/ballistics_rifle.html -Cal Last edited by calinb; February 19, 2009 at 01:43 PM. Reason: .308 and kill note |
February 19, 2009, 03:00 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2008
Posts: 533
|
I prefer the Glaser, 7.8" penetration with fist sized wound channel.http://www.brassfetcher.com/Brassfet...afety_Slug.pdf Note it will penetrate one layer of drywall, but the bullet maintains most of it's shape,and most of the pellets are retained in the bullet . Most sheetrock walls are double layers of sheetrock and exterior also have insulation in between, so I don't think I'll kill any of my neighbors if I should miss the badguy.
__________________
I've made a lot of money in my life, most was spent on booze, babes, guns, and poker,the rest I wasted! |
February 19, 2009, 03:18 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 20, 2005
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 683
|
The "Conclusion" is the best part of that .pdf:
Having evaluated this particular line of Safety Slug against standardized barriers and ballistic media, a few conclusions may be made. First, the penetration of the tested round against a bare gelatin block is wholly inadequate when viewed in light of the FBI minimum penetration depth of 12î in calibrated ballistic gelatin.
__________________
Join the community at GunUp! |
February 19, 2009, 04:02 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2008
Posts: 533
|
And the FBI found the 147 gr Hst totally inadequate with 23" and hardly any expansion.Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
__________________
I've made a lot of money in my life, most was spent on booze, babes, guns, and poker,the rest I wasted! |
February 19, 2009, 04:47 PM | #32 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 3, 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,421
|
When it comes to frangibles, they mostly don't. These are one-trick ponies. In a frontal shot, if the fellow doesn't throw a forearm up as you pull the trigger, and you hit him in the center of mass, and he's not overly large, and you manage to weave it between the ribs, it'll probably work great. The Glaser is simply designed for best case scenario placement. When you start throwing obstacles in it's path, the performance falls apart (even if the bullet doesn't).
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Granted, these are interior walls, but it looks like any safety advantage will be provided by it's lack of mass, not it's construction.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" --commonly misattributed to, and most likely not, Benjamin Franklin |
||||
February 21, 2009, 01:19 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: America
Posts: 3,479
|
A rose is a rose, and a frangible round is a frangible round...
__________________
Meriam Webster's: Main Entry: ci·vil·ian Pronunciation: \sə-ˈvil-yən also -ˈvi-yən\, Function: noun, Date: 14th century, 1: a specialist in Roman or modern civil law, 2 a: one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force b: outsider 1, — civilian adjective |
February 21, 2009, 11:17 AM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 20, 2005
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 683
|
The only frangible round I've ever seen perform acceptably on the FBI's penetration protocols are the "HP" rounds from International Cartridge Corporation. If you click over to their site, you can view the entire 3:16 minute video. It's a little dry, but it's good stuff. The video is here.
The way the round was explained to me, is because it's a sintered projectile, the top 1/2 of the bullet fragments, and behaves like a Glaser, while the base of the projectile continues to penetrate the target, acting like a wadcutter.
__________________
Join the community at GunUp! |
|
|