|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 30, 2007, 02:19 PM | #1 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 19, 2005
Location: virtual internet world with a Daisy Red Ryder, LOL
Posts: 683
|
Gov and insurance: paying out $800K on $114K property
Under NFIP(National Flood Insurance Program), everybody pays a flat rate independent of risk and past history. In one example cited below(source included), a property with a market value of around $114K received over $800K in compensation via repeated filing when flooding took place.
Why does this happen? Basically, the home owner in flood prone area had ZERO incentive to build anywhere else no matter how many times his home got flooded because his home will always be made whole (to pre-flood condition) with no increase in rate. The owner in flood prone area was always paying the same rate as somebody who lived in low risk area. This is the case of a homeowner who lived by the river paying the same rate for flood insurance protection as a homeowner who lived in the middle of desert. If a private insurance firm behaved like the government did with NFIP, they would go bankrupt. THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM: REVIEW AND REAUTHORIZATION Tuesday, April 1, 2003 U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity, Committee on Financial Services, Washington, D.C. Quote:
Federal Flood Insurance: The Repetitive Loss Problem by Rawle O. King Policy Issuance and Claims Adjusting CRS Report for Congress Federal Flood Insurance: The Repetitive Loss Problem Rawle O. King, Analyst In Industry Economics, Government and Finance Division Quote:
Last edited by theinvisibleheart; July 30, 2007 at 11:25 PM. |
||
July 30, 2007, 09:16 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2000
Location: California USA
Posts: 4,533
|
I agree.
There are reasonable people who make a strong argument that the only flood aid that should be given for property loss is to buy the property for fair market value and let the owner relocate to a safe place.
Repeated payouts to people in dangerous areas with no incentive to leave are a waste of our tax money.
__________________
Regards, Ledbetter from thefiringline TFL #4573 NRA for Life Winchester Canyon Gun Club for Life |
|
|