Another Poll For Ann Coulter At Bill O'Reilly's Website

[Acujeff]

Vote For Ann Coulter at Bill O'Reilly weekly poll.
Ann's really stirring up the media. She's a pro-RKBA gunowner and conservative satirist - gotta love her.

Do you approve of the personal attacks used in Ann Coulter's new book?
Yes
No

Go vote for Ann at:

http://www.billoreilly.com/

[FirstFreedom]

Thank you for alerting me to anything that I can vote on to make that 2-bit shill look like the worthless blowhard she is. Pro-RKBA or not, she's nothing but a mindless Shrub whore (is "whore" within the realm of acceptable words on TFL?).

[MeekAndMild]

Thanks. I voted against her. I don't think that conservatives need to use so much rhetoric to discuss the truth. Liberals need it because their case is mostly hype.

[Real Gun]

There is no provision to vote for the ones (attacks) that are well founded. One is then only voting for form, not substance.

[mthalo]

As I stated in another thread, I think she's an abrasive loudmouth (not that it would be a challenge to find a few liberal abrasive loudmouth writers out there).

As a writer myself, I don't think she'd be doing her job unless she's ******* some people off, but she takes it a little too far. Her advocating invading nations and converting the popuulace to Christianity doesn't do the conservatives any good. To me, that goes beyond witty and into alarming.

I was watching a show on VH1 the other night and Ann is an admitted Deadhead, so she can't be completely evil.

[1BadF350]

Conservatives have Ann Coulter
Liberals have Ted Rall, Adrianna Huffington and her gang etc, etc.

This controversy exists on both sides of the political spectrum, but in my opinion the liberal pundits get 90% of the media attention.
The problem is, no matter what side of the spectrum, none of them know when to shut up.
Arguing with a liberal is like playing tennis with a brick wall. No matter how perfect your game, you just can't win.

[Leif]

Arguing with a liberal is like playing tennis with a brick wall. No matter how perfect your game, you just can't win.

Same could be said of a great many conservatives as well.

[Redworm]

Coulter is the right's version of Michael Moore. Two sides of the same coin.

[1BadF350]

Since this topic is really going nowhere, I see no point in continuing it.
Leif, nice volley.

[Blammer]

The only way to win an argument with an individual with that peculiar mindset - is NOT to play their game at all.

[MinutemanEagle1]

It would be nice if a poll went up on some well-traveled site somewhere, which said:

Q: Do you approve of the things Ann Coulter said in her book "Godless"? And, have you read the book?

1.) Yes, I approve, and I have read the book.

2.) Yes, I approve, and I have not read the book.

3.) No, I do not approve, and I have read the book.

4.) No, I do not approve, and I have not read the book.

--------------------------

My guess is, the results would come out pretty close to:

1.) 60%
2.) 20%
3.) 0.5%
4.) 19.5%

The reason I'm guessing this way, is because I've read about 1/3 of the book so far, and what I've seen so far is (a) factual and well backed up, and (b) devastating. And I haven't even gotten to the 9/11 parts yet.

The book is two hundred something pages long. I understand that about half of one page is directed at the four 9/11 widows who have been using their husbands' deaths to bash George Bush. The only people who vote for Choice 4 above, are those who think the book deals ONLY with ALL the 9/11 widows... which is what the press has been reporting.

Reading the book, will change your mind. Given the huge, horrible trail of evidence and conclusions Coulter lays out, it's hard to see how the leftists in this country can even look at their own faces in a mirror after supporting the positions they have for so long, with the results they have incurred. The leftists habitually try to let people forget what they had done in the past, before pushing the same thing all over again. Coulter removes the ravages of time on people's memories, and lays out events in a neat timeline for all to see. And the results aren't pretty.

[Mannlicher]

Bill is a real bozo. The wording on that 'poll' reminds me of the old saw, "say, do you still beat your wife?" Loaded up front with negative crap.
What Ann says is worth saying, and it's about time someone said it. This thread just points out the number of MoveOn.org and DemocraticUnderground
members that have joined here recently, and just to bloviate the liberal line.

[Leif]

Yeah, that must be it, Mannlicher.

[Fal 4 Me]

The reason I'm guessing this way, is because I've read about 1/3 of the book so far, and what I've seen so far is (a) factual and well backed up, and (b) devastating. And I haven't even gotten to the 9/11 parts yet.

Please don't take this as a personal attack, because it is in no way meant to be, but can you clarify what you mean by factual and well backed up? Do you mean it goes along with other stuff you've read? Do you mean you've gone and looked at her source material, her source material was correct and not in error, and by reading the source material one can only come to the same conclusion that she came to? Have you done independent research that agrees with Coulter? Again not trying to attack, but I can't be sure anything is "factual and well backed up" unless I go to the source material, read what it says and am sure that the material hasn't been twisted by the author, in this case by Coulter.

[Wildalaska]

Is there a choice for she is an idiot? Ive picked up girls smarter than her, and if they fall for my lines they are pretty dumb

WildthatsmychoiceAlaska