The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 16, 2006, 01:50 PM   #1
minsonngo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2006
Location: Behind my Glock 34.
Posts: 100
Springfield XD KB!...

Glocks aren't the only guns that KB!



minsonngo is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 01:56 PM   #2
Nigelcorn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 12, 2006
Posts: 141
Wow. What ammo where you using?
Nigelcorn is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 01:58 PM   #3
minsonngo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2006
Location: Behind my Glock 34.
Posts: 100
The guy was shooting his own reloads. I think it was 230 lead rn with 5gr of win231.
minsonngo is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 03:02 PM   #4
threegun
Junior member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2006
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 4,000
So much for a fully supported chamber. Just goes to show you that the KB is not a "Glock" only issue nor a chamber support issue. The Glock haters are not going to like this news.
threegun is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 03:12 PM   #5
Mokumbear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Posts: 696
Ouch!

Ouch!

I am no expert, but it does seem from anecdotal evidence that
reloads raise the chance for a KB.

Do you think that polymer framed pistols of any variety have a greater chance of a KB?

Now, on the other hand, my local gun shop has a KB'd revolver that
certainly looked like it was once a pretty solid piece of steel hardware.
It was reloads in this case, also.

(Although, I might add that in a play to increase profits, they insist you
buy your ammo there, which I dislike). They can then point to the
KB'd revolver and say, "See!"...
Mokumbear is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 04:05 PM   #6
Gib
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2005
Posts: 163
The KB doesn't look even close to the chamber from the picture. It looks as if it went off just above the mag. Pretty strange.
Gib is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 04:09 PM   #7
BUCKMARK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 19, 2004
Location: south central Pa.
Posts: 299
"The KB doesn't look even close to the chamber from the picture. It looks as if it went off just above the mag. Pretty strange."

That's usually where they blow out. Many Glocks that have KB'd did the same.

Look at the right side of a Kahr poly handgun...they have a "blowout patch" built into the frame.
__________________
NRA-GOA

Let's Roll!
BUCKMARK is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 04:15 PM   #8
4EVERM-14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 12, 2006
Location: Pennsy
Posts: 720
Could it have been a high primer-out of battery discharge??
__________________
David
NRA Benefactor Member
Distinguished Rifleman #731
Presidents 100
4EVERM-14 is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 04:19 PM   #9
Gib
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2005
Posts: 163
You’re starting to scare me. I think I'll stick with carbon steel frames.
Gib is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 04:27 PM   #10
Doug.38PR
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 18, 2005
Posts: 3,298
stay away from plastic guns
Doug.38PR is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 05:09 PM   #11
MrApathy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2004
Posts: 529
is that a KB or did it fire OOB
big difference. I know the XD40's have as good as chamber as you can get with a autoloader. dont know about the 45acp.

slide is OOB.

how many times was the brass loaded. 45acp kbing is nothing new
as far as mentioning glocks big whoop. 1911's have kbed long before glocks. though 1911's in 45acp for most part have unsupported chambers coincidence glocks do too but glocks have a feedramp and have the ability to have better support. glock has been improving the chamber support and same time had to rework magazine followers slowly fixing the engineering fubar.

table gunsmith doing a ramp or throat job on 1911 or glock will have the gun dangerously unsupported in no time regardless of ammo.

so what primer was used in the load?

something funny the camera date stamp says 3/18/2003 yet the newspaper in the background says Dec 15 2006
__________________
Divided and conquered, Gripped by fear
Wishful thinking that it can't happen here
It's well underways but nobody knows
A repeat of history, That's how it goes
MrApathy is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 06:04 PM   #12
denfoote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 12, 1999
Location: Buckeye Arizona
Posts: 5,526
Quote:
something funny the camera date stamp says 3/18/2003 yet the newspaper in the background says Dec 15 2006
Good call!!

I'm begining to smell the faint odor of photoshop residue!!!!
__________________
Ich bin kein Nationalsozialist!!!!!!
Ich bin Republikaner!!!!!!!!
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset.
Arizona: Flush the Johns!!!
denfoote is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 06:07 PM   #13
Ausserordeutlich
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Posts: 996
The original story is on XDforums. The camera's date was incorrectly set. Guy was using 5gr. of a fast powder; probably doublecharged, though could have been a feedramp-induced setback.

The composition of the frame had NOTHING to do with the event. You could mount a slide and barrel on an oak frame and it'd work o.k.
Ausserordeutlich is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 06:43 PM   #14
JDG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 673
Doublecharge? Xds CAN fire out of battery, high primer could have done it. Most likely a reload booboo.
JDG is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 06:50 PM   #15
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,993
Quote:
stay away from plastic guns
I've seen at least one expert recommend plastic guns because they tend to absorb more of the impact by stretching or deforming rather than transferring it to the shooter or breaking up and turning into shrapnel.

Blowing up a gun has little or nothing to do with what the frame is made of and a lot to do with the ammo being used.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 09:29 PM   #16
Mokumbear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Posts: 696
Thanks...

Thank you for the clarification...

Are you implying this is a reload issue rather than a gun quality issue?

Certainly, using non-standard reloads adds a "wild card" to the equation.

Anyway, just like in aviation they say "any landing you can walk away from is a good landing",
I suppose that any KB that just results in a little hand injury is no big deal in the grand scheme of things.

All the same, on 2nd handling (but not firing) I was not really thrilled with the XD95.
It just seemed "cheap".

I would prefer my handguns made in the US, Germany or Austria, but that's just my 2 cents.
Mokumbear is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 10:01 PM   #17
arkie2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 3, 2006
Posts: 475
Anyway, just like in aviation they say "any landing you can walk away from is a good landing",


They also say the definition of an excellent landing is one where you can use the equipment again. Guess this would just qualify as a good landing!
arkie2 is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 10:08 PM   #18
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
What you have here is a case head failure. It blows out the bottom of the case at the 6 O'clock position and down through the mag well, often wrecking the mag and grips. This happens with the gun in full lockup.

It can be due to weakened brass, an overcharge or a deep-seated bullet that spiked the pressure.

The gun handled the pressure well enough for a plastic pistola. I have seen the same thing with 1911's whose barrels have have been over-ramped, leaving too much unsupported brass. It typically wrecks or blows the mag out, and cracks one or both grips.

KaBooms are rare in 9mm Glocks; they are much more prevalent in the .40+ Glocks. Having been privvy to NCIC teletypes on the subject since the guns came out, I can tell you that it's not "the ammo." Many LE Glocks have cracked up with factory loads.

This is the first XD I have seen that suffered pressure-related structural damage. After running three of them hard for a couple of years (including LOTS of lead-bullet reloads in the .40's) I'm pretty sure that their full chamber support is the reason why we haven't seen more postsl ike this one.

I'm not particularly "pro XD", and in fact I won't buy anymore until Springfield changes their "no parts for the peons" policy. Neither am I 'anti-Glock" but if I had one in .40+ I would be ditching the factory barrel for an aftermarket job with better chamber support and conventional rifling.

...or just keep my 1911, which suits my purposes fine.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
Sarge is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 10:44 PM   #19
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,993
Quote:
Having been privvy to NCIC teletypes on the subject since the guns came out, I can tell you that it's not "the ammo." Many LE Glocks have cracked up with factory loads.
Like any other manufacturing concern, it's safe to assume that Glock puts out a faulty gun now and again--so you're right, it's not always the ammo.

However, I feel safe in making a couple of statements.

Whatever the cause of a particular kB!, the frame material is not the issue.

All factory ammunition is not the same. I've seen internet articles about a few kB!s resulting from the dangerously shoddy A-Merc ammunition. Those got written up as "factory ammunition kB!s", but that's hardly the whole story. Even Federal--one of the better manufacturers, had some ammunition issues early on apparently resulting in kB!s that drove them to redesign their .40S&W case. Again, that's factory ammunition causing kB!s but where the gun isn't at fault.

It's hard to get good (accurate) documentation on the ammunition being used in kB!s. As I've posted before, the one and only kB! that I've been around ruined the gun and also apparently damaged the memory of the shooter while leaving him otherwise totally uninjured. He couldn't remember anything about the ammunition he'd been using--said he was using lots of different kinds. Later some of his friends (who were also at the range) confided to me that this was his first effort at reloading. Another "factory ammunition kB!?" Well, that's how the shooter reported it. He was just hoping Glock would give him a gun--or at least fix his cheap. Now tell me that a police officer who blows up an issue weapon using reloaded ammunition in violation of his department's policy is going to stand up and say that he ruined PD property by breaking the rules. Probably not--that's more factory ammunition kB!s.

Setback. Even good quality .40S&W factory ammunition without any design flaws can be rendered very dangerous with even moderate amounts of setback. In the 180gr loadings, relatively small amounts of setback (caused by repeatedly rechambering a round in an autopistol) can easily drive the chamber pressure past proof pressure levels resulting in yet another way that factory ammunition--even good quality factory ammunition can blow up a perfectly good gun.

Am I saying that it's ALWAYS the ammunition? No, of course not, there are almost certainly cases where there's a problem with the gun. Saying otherwise would be just as foolish as claiming that it's ALWAYS the gun.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 10:54 PM   #20
Daves-got-guns
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 14, 2006
Location: Marysville Washington
Posts: 291
i would have to say, i would not buy ANY glock in .40, just because i have heard awhole hellofa lot more kbs and out of battery firing cause kbs in THIS platform then any other gun on here. I have scene pics of 1911s, smith wessons a ruger, but for glocks little over 20 year service and as many kbs as ive heard of, id say no glockie for me. I would buy a glock in 9mm, because i havent heard of a handfull of kbs in this caliber, but the .40 sound slike too much. No reloads in any of my autoloaders, even though i dont reload they will never touch or chamber into any of my weapons. Factory ammo works plenty good, and reloading in a revolver might be ok, but id rather not push it.
Daves-got-guns is offline  
Old December 16, 2006, 11:23 PM   #21
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
John,

I am personally aware of three that went KaBlooey at department qualifications. One was with Winchester USA .40 ball, and another .40 (IIRC) was with Hydrashoks. The third was a 10mm, and it was a reload- the same reload they had shot hundreds of through Colt Deltas, without a problem.

Those NCIC TTY's I mentioned? The vast majority, WAY above 80% were at department quals, during a firing exercise, and with factory ammunition. We saw (my wife & I; she was a 911 dispatcher and I was the Sgt. in charge of the firearms program at the time) between 50 and 75 of those TTY's over 5 years, between '90 & '94. I didn't keep a tally of which ammo blew what caliber Glock. It became apparent early on that they were blowing with a wide enough variety of issued factory loads, that no one brand was responsible. There was simply no other conclusion to arrive at, other than the gun itself having a problem.

I have had two different Dept's under my belt since then, and both have either tried to get me to buy a Glock, or tried to issue me one. I have thus far successfully avoided either one. Sigs, Berettas and 1911's have occupied my duty holsters when I carried autos. i may get stuck with one someday, but I will replace the factory barrel with an aftermarket job with better chamber support- and conventional rifling. Or I simply won't carry it.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
Sarge is offline  
Old December 17, 2006, 12:11 AM   #22
Shane Tuttle
Staff
 
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,443
come on now...

Understanding that all aspects must be considered, you really have to just put 2+2 together here. "Reload"? "Lead RN"? I don't care if it's the almighty 1911, drop in sand then pick up and keep firin' Glock, or the only polymer gun you should get XD. Personal reloads jack up the probability of failures. Throw all the "data" you want, but common sense dictates that.
"Not only a Glock issue or a fully supported chamber issue"? Sure doesn't help matters either.
"Glock haters are not going to like this news"? If you're building an argument that XD "lovers" aren't going to have a leg to stand on anymore based on those pics, I think you'd better not pursue law. Besides, I think that a good number of Glock "haters" really don't want any good citizen behing any gun that fails no matter the brand. Maybe I'm off of context.
The word "Reload" ought to be closely examined. There's not a SINGLE gun on the market that is immune to faulty reloads.
Both brands of guns are well made and isolated incidents can and WILL occur.
Shane Tuttle is offline  
Old December 17, 2006, 12:22 AM   #23
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,993
Even if the problems happened on the range with qualification ammo, that still doesn't totally rule out ammunition issues. As I pointed out, Federal had some problems with some of their early .40S&W ammo. Even factory ammunition from normally reliable sources is not immune from blowing up guns.
Quote:
There was simply no other conclusion to arrive at, other than the gun itself having a problem.
Well, not exactly. Even when it seems that there is a wide variety of good quality ammunition causing the problem, there is actually another quite reasonable possibility. It's possible for a perfectly good round of ammunition to be the one travelling down the bore when a perfectly safe gun comes apart. Stay with me now!

Shooting excellent quality jacketed ammunition down the leaded bore of a Glock pistol (or even other pistols--some Beretta pistol manuals contain a strong warning against this practice) is a great way to get it to spontaneously disassemble. Add to that the fact that it's often difficult to detect leading in the Glock bore (I once had to argue for quite awhile with a poster on another forum to convince him that the used Glock he just bought had a heavily leaded bore) and you get a very plausible way for a person to blow up a perfectly safe gun with perfectly safe ammunition.

Sure, they're firing good quality qualification ammo on the range under supervision--but did someone check the bore for leading, BEFORE the qualification started, to see if the "cramming" they did to pass the qualification was done with cheap lead ammunition? Probably not...
Quote:
The third was a 10mm, and it was a reload- the same reload they had shot hundreds of through Colt Deltas, without a problem.
Like it or not, there's a good reason for the "no reload" prohibition that Glocks come with. The larger chambers can definitely stress the brass more--if the brass has been through a previous firing cycle, that extra stress can be enough to get a failure. I can only say that in this case, if a person doesn't want to follow the manufacturer's instructions, Glocks are not for them unless they're extremely careful and know about as much about the Glock pistols and reloading as Glock does.

Again, I am NOT saying that all Glock kB!s are ammunition related! That would be just as foolish as maintaining that all of them are gun related.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old December 17, 2006, 01:51 AM   #24
Shane Tuttle
Staff
 
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,443
John and invssgt,
I believe those are valid statements you posted.
I'm not a hater of either brand. I just think the obvious sometimes stares right at people and they still suggest little or no wrong doing.
Shane Tuttle is offline  
Old December 17, 2006, 07:11 AM   #25
threegun
Junior member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2006
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 4,000
What I find suspiciously funny is how so many KB's by Glock are from Law Enforcement. 50-75 KB's with 80 percent law enforcement.....why? I also find it odd that with so many civilians owning Glocks there aren't dozens of pictures like the XD. Glock out sells XD and has been around much longer so where are the pictures? Something stinks, lots of story's and few pictures.

The only KB I witnessed was a 1911 and a reload. Despite the steel frame it blew the mag contents out the bottom and the grips turned into splinters under the shooters hand. The man wasn't injured bad but did suffer some pokes and burns.
threegun is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07280 seconds with 7 queries