![]() |
|
|||||||
| Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: September 30, 1998
Location: Calif
Posts: 4,241
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/wor...000/621329.stm
Q&A: Walter Cronkite - an icon of American news BBC Hardtalk's Tim Sebastian talks to Walter Cronkite - 'America's most trusted man' - about his career in journalism, including the moment he told a shocked nation that its president had been killed. You don't think much of television news these days. You think the viewers are being sold short. I'm deeply concerned about it. I think that there's a real problem in the United States. Polls show that most people still get most of their news from television. I claim that those who do are inadequately informed, too poorly informed to intelligently exercise their franchise at the polls. The democratic system is challenged by the failure in television because our evening news programmes have gone for an attempt to entertain as much as to inform in the desperate fight for ratings. Cable has come along; many all-news 24 hour cable outlets in the United States. They have cut deeply into the traditional networks' viewing audience. The owners of the networks today are not the old pioneer broadcasters who founded the networks, but these great entertainment conglomerates mostly dictated by Hollywood standards. They're going for the lowest common denominator. One of the broadcasts that you're most remembered for was the assassination of John F Kennedy. How clearly do you remember your feelings when the news of the shooting in Dallas started to come in? That is etched on my memory. I was at my anchor desk. One of our editors was over at the teletype machines when the bulletin came from Dallas that shots had rung out in Dealy Plaza in the streets of Dallas as the President's motorcade went by. A moment later, it appeared that the President might have been hit. The motorcade had broken up and was rushing to the hospital and it got worse and worse. He appeared to be in bad shape. Well you know there's an interesting thing about us newspeople. Not until after its over do we sit down and really think emotionally about what has happened. But after an hour or so of reporting this developing story I had to make the announcement; 'An announcement has come from Parkland Hospital. President Kennedy died at such and such an hour.' When I said those words, I realised the horror of the whole thing. I choked up a bit. I had difficulty finding words through welling tears but managed it somehow or other. For all of your experience of war, you're still in favour of bringing the action of war into people's living rooms. Oh very definitely. The military people don't like it; the government probably doesn't like it, but the people should know what they're sending their young people into when they permit their governments to declare war and engage in war. They should have to share what they have asked those young people to share. I believe in that. Perhaps if all the peoples of the world understand what war really means, we would eliminate it. You did a report in 1968 on the Tet offensive which was credited with swaying American public opinion towards removing US troops from Vietnam. Did you cross the line? Did you go too far? I didn't go too far. I crossed the line! The difference was that we enunciated very clearly that this was an editorial. It came at the end of a documentary on my experiences going out to cover Tet - one person's view of Tet. I got there within a week of the Tet offensive. I saw this action and we reported it. We said 'After this commercial break, I'm going to come back and give you my personal opinion of what I saw out there. This will be my personal editorial which we do not do normally do here, but I think it's important.' You said that it's increasingly clear to this reporter that the only rational way out would be to negotiate: not as victors but as honourable people. Apparently President Lyndon Johnson watched this in the White House and was quite affected by it, wasn't he? Yes. Some of his assistants said later that his remark was 'If I've lost Cronkite, I've lost Middle America.' I was a little offended when I heard that . I considered that if he lost me he must have lost all of America! The fact was he apparently thought that this was somewhat important. A couple of weeks later, he announced he would not run for re-election. Some people said that the broadcast had an importance in having him reach that decision. I don't think that is so. There were a lot of other things impressing him at that moment - that he could not win again. He was disappointed with the Pentagon for having misled him into staying with the war for as long as he did. The military still blames the press over Vietnam, don't they? Officially, they brought out a report which claimed it wasn't the press coverage that did them in. Most of the military establishment believes that it was television and its exposure of their soldiers at their worst moments of death and mortal wounds, the horror of war. And you're happy about that? Yes I am. It makes it difficult for democracy. But it's the only fair way. I believe in total openness of the press in all things. I'm an absolutist in the matter of freedom of speech in the press. I am convinced that democracy cannot function unless its people are fully informed as to what their government is doing in its name. Do you believe in presidential privacy? Depending on whether their peccadilloes affect their ability to govern. I do not think that the stand-off with President Clinton - the Monica Lewinsky scandal - was proper to bring to the public's attention. He wouldn't have had to lie to the country if it hadn't have been made a public issue for political purposes. He should not have been asked those questions about his personal life. I don't think that's the public's business. Unless that seems to endanger the job they're doing, the job they've sworn an oath to - then it should be exposed. The case of President Kennedy. He had several liaisons. He had one with a woman called Judith Exner. She was the mistress of a Mafia boss. Highly dangerous situation. Opened him to blackmail and all kinds of dangers. If the press had known about that - I don't think they did - they had a responsibility to report that. You seem to have had the news business in your blood right from the start. You were something of a town crier from the age of six growing up in Kansas City. I was perhaps the only one of my six-year old colleagues who read the newspaper and I couldn't wait to tell my friends the news of the day. We didn't have radio in those days - barely. I remember reading in your memoir about the Nuremberg war crimes trial. It was the only time you said that you had seen a group of people - the Nazi officials - you wanted to spit on. How strongly did you feel? My flesh crawled just seeing those people marching near the dock in Nuremberg and knowing the blood of millions of people was on their hands. It was creepy. It was awful. You hoped that some good would come out of there, that there would be a 'Parliament of Nations'. If the UN is anything to go by, that's not going to work is it? I wouldn't give up on the UN yet. I think we are realising that we are going to have to have an international rule of law. We need not only an executive to make international law, but we need the military forces to enforce that law and the judicial system to bring the criminals to justice before they have the opportunity to build military forces that use these horrid weapons that rogue nations and movements can get hold of - germs and atomic weapons. Our whole society is in danger - more than its ever been from limited numbers of people - terrorism, national war movements, civil war type movements. There's going to be a realisation of that now. Whereas before, there was a possibility of each nation being in its own way insular, particularly the USA, being protected by two great oceans. We are not protected by two great oceans any longer. American people are going to begin to realise that perhaps they are going to have to yield some sovereignty to an international body to enforce world law, and I think that's going to come to other people as well. It's a fair distance to get there, but we are not ever going to get there unless we keep trying to push ourselves onto the road. There's still a Walter Cronkite Unit at CBS, 20 years after you finished presenting the news programme. The mail still comes in. Are you gratified by that? Well of course I am. I don't understand it but I'm gratified by it. Little old ladies come up to me. Recently, I was doing a film out at Yellowstone National Park. A woman came up to me and said 'Did anybody ever tell you that you look just like Walter Cronkite looked before he died - except I think he was thinner!' The full interview with Walter Cronkite can be seen on Hardtalk with Tim Sebastian on BBC News 24 at 2230 and on BBC World at 1530, 1930, 0030 and 0430 gmt ------------------ "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes" RKBA! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: October 12, 1999
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,919
|
Isn't it strange how those who advocate the removal of freedom for safety are always in positions of perceived power? Perceived in that there are a few of them and many of us. Never forget that.
------------------ "When guns are outlawed;I will be an outlaw." |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: June 10, 1999
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,419
|
Well, I guess the only phrase that really sums this up is:
"All people are equil. Some are just more equil than others..." "Give up some soverengity" - over my dead body. CMOS ------------------ GOA, TSRA, LEAA, NRA, SAF and I vote! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Staff Alumnus
Join Date: October 12, 1998
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,971
|
Also notice how he says that Klinton's personal life should stay personal and not public then goes on to apparantly state that Kennedy's "liaisons" should have been made public. I guess Klinton could make the potential blackmailers his friends. And we all know what mysteriuosly "happens" to Klinton's friends. Kronkite also defends Klinton's lying about the sex scandal. America's "most trusted" man is now defending lying?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: June 7, 1999
Posts: 3,284
|
Re Cronkite on "america must give up somne sovereignty" we have heard this before, but I wonder as to whom it would be given.
We have also heard the dictum that "americans must give up some of their cherished constitutional rights", of course, for the accomplishment of some "unspecified, greater good". The writer wonders as to which of HIS rights Mr. Cronkite is prepared to give up? I believe that such as that would be a most interesting discussion. Mr Cronkite is always welcom to join in the discussion, so far as I'm concerned. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: August 24, 1999
Posts: 281
|
CMOS has a point....Having been in the Military for over 19 1/2 years, seeing how well the UN operates, Giving up sovereignty is not an option, and over my dead body as well!
------------------ ...“ They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” --Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759. Take care and God Bless, El Jefe The ANTI-HCI Site! |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: August 4, 1999
Posts: 404
|
I love this part:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>I wouldn't give up on the UN yet. I think we are realising that we are going to have to have an international rule of law. [/quote] Compare the UN Declaration of Human Rights to our Bill of Rights. The Un version basically reserves all unenumerated rights for the government, and they are not really rights, but privelages; they come from the government, not the creator. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 1999
Posts: 1,085
|
The only thing I agreed with was his answer to the first question about the network news and how pathetic it is.
Are there still those that consider the NWO a "conspiracy?" These people are out of the shadows and they know what they want. Little point of clarification: you cannot guve up "some sovereignty". If you give up ANY amount of sovereignty, you are no longer sovereign. Sort of like giving up "some" of your virginity. Either you is, or you ain't. ------------------ "Put a rifle in the hands of a Subject, and he immediately becomes a Citizen." -- Jeff Cooper "The fact is that the average man's love of liberty is nine-tenths imaginary, exactly like his love of sense, justice and truth. He is not actually happy when free; he is uncomfortable, a bit alarmed, and intolerably lonely. Liberty is not a thing for the great masses of men. It is the exclusive possession of a small and disreputable minority, like knowledge, courage and honor. It takes a special sort of man to understand and enjoy liberty - and he is usually an outlaw in democratic societies." -- H.L. Mencken, February 12, 1923, Baltimore Evening Sun |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
|
I find it more than a little odd that those who shout loudest for complete freedom of the press (1st A.) are usually the ones shouting the loudest to infridge the 2nd Amendment.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 1999
Posts: 757
|
Another thing to keep in mind, is that being one of the most trusted men in America, placed Walnut Crankcase in a very desirable position to speak what was to be said, not what was needed to be said.
He was, and still is, a mouthpiece for others'. He is the fella the retired among us listen to, because his voice remembers fond times, when we were young, and prosperous. We were invinceable!!! Baseball Players have been openly recommended for psychiatric exams, because they've had the tenacity to speak their own mind. Oh yeah, Walters just a mouthpiece. Best Regards, Don ------------------ "The day I turn in my own countrymen, will be the day I put a bullet in my own head". --George Harris, Patriot Games-- [This message has been edited by Donny (edited January 31, 2000).] |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2000
Posts: 4,621
|
I wonder how Mr. Cronkite would feel if Algore proposed licensing and fingerprinting all journalists "for the sake of the children." Such a proposal would ensure that nobody would post a site on the internet as hateful and inflammatory as the site put up by Eric Harris and Dylan Kliebold. Hmmm?
Dick |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 692
|
"...but we are not ever going to get there unless we keep trying to push ourselves onto the road."
I don't think so, Walter... Besides, we won't push ourselves; so guess who'll wind up trying to shove us? ------------------ ...defend the 2nd., it protects us all. No fate but what we make... |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 1998
Location: a small forest in Texas
Posts: 7,095
|
Walter Krankheit's elitist desire to subjugate our once free America under
the rule of the United Nations infuriates me to the very edge of self-control. Surpassing vulgarities and profanities, I spit my severest, most degrading epithet into the face of Mister Krankheit, “You Clinton lover!” ------------------ Either you believe in the Second Amendment or you don't. Stick it to 'em! RKBA! |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
|
I have done some work at the UN and I can tellyou that those folks aren't just from other countries, many are from other planets.
It's ironic to me that so much of the world wants what we have in the US, but they don't have the discipline, aren't willing to make the sacrifices, or have a value structure/culture that would support it for very long. In otherwords, if we gave in, they'd just **** it away. Just as we were horribly nieve to think we coud inflict a western-style democratic republic on Vietnam, we would be equally foolish to give in to the UN. Walter has his opinion, I have mine, and as far as I'm concerned, Walter is another one who can go sh*t in his hat. M2 |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,255
|
Ole Walter seems to be suffering from softening of the brain! What do you expect from the "media elite"? Kinda like the "political elite", eh?
![]() ------------------ Be mentally deliberate but muscularly fast. Aim for just above the belt buckle Wyatt Earp If you have to shoot a man, shoot him in the guts, it may not kill him... sometimes they die slow, but it'll paralyze his brain and arm and the fight is all but over Wild Bill Hickok 45 ACP: Give 'em a new navel! BigG It is error alone that needs government support; truth can stand by itself. Tom Jefferson Remember: When you attempt to rationalize two inconsistent positions, you risk drowning as your own sewage backs up. BigG |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: January 29, 1999
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,792
|
First Uncle Walter does an anti-handgun TV spot and now this. I used to figure him for a decent man and maybe he really is. However, it sounds to me like his version of reality is as skewed as that of a lot of media personalities. He's forgotten how to think for himself and he can't see beyond the walls of his elite enclave. Pitiful.
------------------ "The eye of television is drawn to violence as the normal eye is drawn to the light in a jewel."--Larry McMurtry. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|