October 7, 2008, 11:04 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2006
Posts: 312
|
N.R.A. vs G.O.A.?
Lately I've been giving this a lot of thought. National Rifle Association has been around longer, but lately I've been hearing that Gun Owners of America fights harder for our 2nd amendment rights.
Please share your thoughts, experience, and or expertise on the subject. I have been a member of both, and it's time to renew. I want to put my money where it'll do the most good. -Bruce |
October 8, 2008, 06:53 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2006
Location: Home of the first First Lady
Posts: 463
|
Oh man, that's like asking which is the best AR...or which .45 ACP is best. Personally, of the two the NRA is my only association.
/breaks out the popcorn
__________________
NRA Endowment Life Member Proud Son of a former Tomb Guard |
October 8, 2008, 07:07 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
In my opinion, the NRA is the best option. It's not perfect, but if you check out their website and research their involvement in the legal issues involving gun ownership, you'll see NRA is active and involved in the issues that impact all of us.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
October 8, 2008, 07:21 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 1999
Location: Knoxville, in the Free State of Tennesse
Posts: 4,190
|
A lot of the attacks against the NRA are actually membership drives for other groups.
When politicians and gun grabbers rail against a group, they attack the NRA. I take that as a positive. There's nothing barring someone from belonging to as many groups as possible, if you can get past the stupid sectarian warfare that's dividing the RKBA movement. |
October 8, 2008, 07:58 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 187
|
I am an NRA member and will remain one, but I still think the NRA has lost its way on some important issues. One of the current issues where I strongly disagree with the NRA is their unfortunate support of H.R. 4900. First they call the ATF&E "jack booted thugs" then they want to give them even more ammunition to use against gun dealers! Go figure!
|
October 8, 2008, 08:53 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,004
|
This has been on their site since July...
"Help Wanted Gun Owners of California and Gun Owners of America are looking to hire an energetic person with a marketing degree or marketing experience to promote both organizations and oversee events. Must be willing to locate to Sacramento, California area. Travel required." ...I guess they're having trouble filling it. It's a real shame, what with this being an election year and all. John |
October 8, 2008, 10:01 AM | #7 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2006
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
Quote:
OK, Back to being serious. I know there has got to be a lot of experience here on this site, and that's what I'm hoping to tap into. Thanks to those that have tried. Answers like those from Old Timer's, Johnbt's, buzz_knox's, & Kreyzhorse's that actually bring up issues, Pro, or Con. I appreciate that, as well as any more to come. Thanks guys. We need to get real serious about this given the coming political climate. -Bruce Last edited by Ballenxj; October 8, 2008 at 10:02 AM. Reason: mis spelled "too" |
||
October 8, 2008, 11:20 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 11, 2005
Posts: 1,177
|
The NRA is HUGE, rich and powerful. All that money gives it lots of influence over politicians at all levels of government. But recently the NRA seems more willing to compromise with the Anti's on anti-gun laws/policies.
GOA is much smaller and doesn't have near the influence over politicians that the NRA does but is rabidly pro-gun and does not compromise anti's. IMO if you have a little extra $$$ joining both would not be a bad idea.
__________________
America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards. Claire Wolfe |
October 8, 2008, 11:38 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 18, 2000
Location: Hooksett, NH
Posts: 1,847
|
Quote:
That's not to say that GOA is not effective in much of what it sets out to do, but when you need long reach to deliver the Sunday punch, you need the NRA. Even Bill Clinton understands this fact.
__________________
Not a blacksmith could be found in the whole land of Israel, because the Philistines had said, "Otherwise the Hebrews will make swords or spears!" 1 Samuel 13:19 |
|
October 8, 2008, 12:05 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2007
Posts: 1,041
|
Quote:
They both have similar goals but different ways of getting there The GOA does not seem to compromise on anything and so gets left out of getting anyghing done many times. On the other hand the NRA is too ready to compromise for many people's taste but does get some things done although not as much as most people want. If you are the liberty or death type the then GOA is for you but if you are ready to sit down at the negoiating table the the NRA is more your type. /I like carmel popcorn myself. |
|
October 8, 2008, 01:52 PM | #11 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2006
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
-Bruce |
|||
October 8, 2008, 04:44 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 2,199
|
The NRA holds more lobbying power, takes a more moderated stance, and is willing to make some compromises (which can hurt if you are a fan of things like NFA items, etc).
The GOA does not seem to compromise, takes the more extreme/hard-line stances, and does not hold nearly as much sway. I like some of the GOA's positions, but they occasionally target our allies, which is a shame, IMO. I think the NRA is better for getting legislation passed (or blocked). |
October 8, 2008, 07:49 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2007
Posts: 1,536
|
Does GOA have Eddie Eagle, Women On Target, extensive and successful gun safety classes for multitudes of people; from LEO to children? Does GOA have a related foundation that has awarded over $100,000,000 in grants to hundreds of organizations from Boy Scouts to ROTC?
|
October 8, 2008, 10:22 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,478
|
It seems the GOA spends most of it's time running the NRA down and not accomplishing anything at all.
As example, the GOA raves about the NRA being too willing to compromise, but it was the NRA that went to court for the people of New Orleans. You never hear about GOA lawyers showing up to help a gun owner. Most people, including a lot of gun owners have never heard of the GOA. As for which is most effective, here's a little test. Go out on the street and stop the first person you see. Ask them about "the gun lobby". 99% of the time they'll say, "You mean the NRA?" Ask about the "GOA" and they'll have no idea what you're talking about. With that said, join both if you can, but the best bang for your buck is the NRA. |
October 9, 2008, 01:19 AM | #15 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,846
|
Lots opf gunowners disagree....
With many of the things the NRA has "allowed" in recent years, and prefer a more hardline stance. NRA positions seeking the greatest good for the greatest numner of gun owners get them blamed as being "sellouts", and "too willing to compromise". Things like the NRA "compromising" on a bill that restricted armor piercing ammunition was shouted to the heavens in some quarters, but the alternative, a fight to the death (which we might have lost) over a bill that would have banned virtually ALL centerfire rifle ammo was never mentioned by those who felt betrayed by the NRA "compromise".
When you take a no compromise at all, ever type of stand, like the GOA often does, you quickly find that only fellow fanatics will listen to you. The huge middle ground people (who consider themselves as reasonable and intelligent) will consider you a "nut". This can often have the effect of making the anti's (the real nuts) case seem more reasonable and acceptable. It often works against the greater good. When it comes to the issues of guns in the political arena, the NRA is the 800lb gorilla. And it is because the NRA is more than just a political gun rights group. Join both, but if you must make a choice, support the NRA. Politicians know the NRA, and know what NRA members can do in the voting booth when they act together. None of the other progun groups have as much clout as the NRA, and the politicians know this too!
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
October 9, 2008, 03:10 AM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 18, 2000
Location: Hooksett, NH
Posts: 1,847
|
Quote:
__________________
Not a blacksmith could be found in the whole land of Israel, because the Philistines had said, "Otherwise the Hebrews will make swords or spears!" 1 Samuel 13:19 |
|
October 9, 2008, 08:45 AM | #17 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
In any case, I'm unhappy with the NRA's compromises on the NFA and 1968 GCA. They often fail to support local and state-level initiatives. In fact, I was very unhappy with their lack of interest in an important set of reforms here in Georgia last year, almost to the point of ending my membership. However, they are still the primary driving force, and without them, forums like this wouldn't exist today, because we wouldn't have guns. I'm a member of both organizations, but the GOA is a bit...too enthusiastic and dogmatic at times (we also have a local group like that), while the NRA is a bit too soft at times. I think we need both, however.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
October 9, 2008, 09:04 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 1999
Location: Knoxville, in the Free State of Tennesse
Posts: 4,190
|
Quote:
|
|
October 9, 2008, 09:28 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Location: Coastal South Texas
Posts: 557
|
The NRA has compromised my rights one too many times (10 round mags.) and is too close with the beltway boys in DC. You send in your dues and then get mail weekly wanting more money. I'll stick to the GOA. They don't compromise!
|
October 9, 2008, 09:45 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 6, 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 995
|
Quote:
Here's the NRA in action in today's news: http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10...st-obama-guns/ Can your beer do this ?
__________________
I am not a real bullet, nor do I play one on television. American socialism: Democrats trying to get Republicans to provide for them. |
|
October 9, 2008, 10:00 AM | #21 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Quote:
I know I wasn't for the NFA, and I was only 7 when the GCA was passed. While that alone doesn't necessarily invalidate what Tom has said, it may shed a little light on why people feel the way they do, about this. You see, back in those days, the NRA was not a political player. The only thing they were worried about were their hunters and sportsman (shotgunners). So they didn't get involved in legislation unless they thought it might hurt their base. The NRA didn't turn to lobbying until the mid-70's, IIRC. So to constantly bring this up (NFA and the '68 GCA) is really a red herring, as there were no (none, nada) pro-gun lobbying groups back then. As for the GOA, unless and until Larry Pratt decides to honestly review legislation and quit sounding alarms over supposed threats; and until Larry Pratt quits denigrating the NRA, in order to suck some of its members into his organization, I'm not even gonna recognize it as a legitimate pro-gun organization. The GOA has proposed no legislation; The GOA has blocked no gun-control measures; The GOA has filed no briefs to the Courts, solely in its own name and the GOA has absolutely no clout as a lobbying organization, before any legislature (State or Federal). The only thing it (GOA) has done with any success, is to get a grass-roots movement going. The caveat here, is that many (most?) times it is for some legislation that the NRA opposes and against whatever legislation the NRA supports. The GOA is, in my opinion, divisive and plays into the hands of the anti-gun folks. If you want another effective organization to belong to (other than or in addition to the NRA), try the SAF. They have filed lawsuits. They have filed amici briefs (in their own name, not merely as one of a large group) to various Circuit Courts and the SCOTUS. They have lobbied directly for and against various legislation (both State and Federal). They are also good at getting grass-roots movements going. They have co-operated with the NRA, when it was in their interests to do so. They strike out on their own when it is prudent. They do not bash other pro-gun groups. The SAF is unifying. |
|
October 9, 2008, 10:06 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 6, 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 995
|
Very well said.
__________________
I am not a real bullet, nor do I play one on television. American socialism: Democrats trying to get Republicans to provide for them. |
October 9, 2008, 10:09 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,004
|
"As for the GOA, unless and until Larry Pratt decides to honestly review legislation and quit sounding alarms over supposed threats; and until Larry Pratt quits denigrating the NRA, in order to suck some of its members into his organization, I'm not even gonna recognize it as a legitimate pro-gun organization."
Well put. Has he been on vacation recently? I haven't seen his usual flood of nonsense e-mails cut-and-pasted all over the net. I hope he hasn't been ill. John |
October 9, 2008, 12:13 PM | #24 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
The NRA was founded to encourage and develop good marksmanship and safety skills. The ILA stuff is a side venture. It's become a very important part of what they do, but some folks (especially antis) lose sight of the the NRA's original purpose. The "no compromise, ever!" folks swing a little too far to the extremes.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
October 9, 2008, 12:25 PM | #25 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2006
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
Here's a copy & paste from their website; Quote:
-Bruce |
||
Tags |
goa , nra |
|
|