|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 26, 2008, 10:46 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 574
|
Sheriff illegally takes away a Glock 26 from a Soccer Mom!
|
December 26, 2008, 10:54 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 19, 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 250
|
Oh brother :barf:! I hope this "sheriff" loses his job.
|
December 26, 2008, 11:32 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2005
Location: Olympia, Wa.
Posts: 535
|
Every state is different, but if it is legal in her state to carry at the soccer game, by all means carry and sue the sheriff dept. In my state it is illegal to carry on school grounds (I'm not sure if she was on school grounds) but if it were legal, I would always be armed! No criminal about to commit a crime has ever stopped and said "the sign says I can't carry here", and stopped.
__________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce Drunk Driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars" Walk softly and carry a big SIG. |
December 26, 2008, 11:41 PM | #4 |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,929
|
The incident happened in September.
She's already got her gun back. Her permit was initially revoked but was reinstated by a judge fairly rapidly. In late November she sued the sheriff for monetary damages and to try to force him to get additional LE education. Her husband has joined the suit against the sheriff on some grounds or another. She had a concealed carry permit. The problem wasn't that she was carrying, it was that she chose to carry openly. That's also legal by the way. Sounds kinda like maybe she was trying to make a statement... I guess she has her wish.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
December 26, 2008, 11:54 PM | #5 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 5, 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 708
|
"She had a concealed carry permit. The problem wasn't that she was carrying, it was that she chose to carry openly. That's also legal by the way. Sounds kinda like maybe she was trying to make a statement... I guess she has her wish".
I don't follow your comment. What did she do wrong, if the law allows open carry I don't see how she is making a statement of any kind. I believe the police were trying to make a statement and should recieve a public reprimanded for doing so. Last edited by Bud Helms; December 27, 2008 at 05:54 PM. Reason: Politics |
December 27, 2008, 12:32 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 1, 2008
Posts: 577
|
"I'd rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it"
it's such a simple and profound statement that no one seems to understand, no matter how many times its said. |
December 27, 2008, 12:44 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 6, 2008
Posts: 895
|
I have been told that ignorance of the law is no excuse when breaking it---if you don't know a law and break it, you are still liable for your actions.
I don't see why we shouldn't hold law enforcement to the same standards that the general population is held to. So, although she got her permit back, she should not have gone ONE day without it because some Sheriff didn't know the law or chose to ignore it. Quote:
I'm glad the woman in question didn't need the protection her permit affords her while it was taken from her for no good reason. [QUOTE]Sounds kinda like maybe she was trying to make a statement...[QUOTE] MOST every group of people that share the same beliefs make "statements" from time to time. Statements are made all the time and actions are taken on things like: abortion, gay rights, Christmas, tee-shirts/clothing, prayer, etc. etc. Gun owners should not be looked at any differently---we collectively make up a much larger percentage of the population than some other groups do---and some of the other groups get a lot of recognition for their efforts in making statements. Maybe she is just taking a page out of another groups play book?? If nothing else, she helped someone in LE learn something!!
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------- "It is better to die on your feet than live on your knees" EMILIANO ZAPATA SALAZAR |
|
December 27, 2008, 12:55 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,902
|
Quote:
|
|
December 27, 2008, 09:42 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2004
Location: Dixie
Posts: 2,315
|
Quote:
Open carry is the epitome of "in your face" behavior. IMHO, it's just plain ignorant to do so in a public environment. I see some yahoo in an open carry mode and I immediately suspect his/her emotional stability give the poor choice he/she has already made. As far as I am concerned, mature people don't display weapons of any sort unless and until they are necessary to safeguard a life...period... YMMV |
|
December 27, 2008, 10:07 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 25, 2005
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 288
|
Quote:
I'm in favor of: carrying responsibly and discretely and keeping a very low profile. No need to make people nervous and attract attention to yourself. Cloudpeak |
|
December 27, 2008, 10:10 AM | #11 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 5, 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 708
|
I agree with the open carry law-If I were a BG I don't think I would screw with a guy/gal that has a Glock strapped on his/her side in open sight. If one has balls enough to carry it in the open, I am quite sure they have balls enough to use it.
|
December 27, 2008, 10:23 AM | #12 | ||
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,929
|
Quote:
The reason I think that her goal was to make a statement is that if her goal was to protect herself and her family she could have legally carried concealed and achieved that goal without any of the hassle she and her family have now been put through. What she did wasn't wrong, but it certainly wasn't the path of least resistance. Quote:
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
||
December 27, 2008, 10:24 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
varoadking + 2 !!
Discretion and common sense goes a long way. We keep hearing about what is legal; how about what is ethical. She needs help !!! Be Safe !!! |
December 27, 2008, 10:27 AM | #14 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 9, 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 457
|
I agree somewhat, myself I would have chose to conceal, but she broke no law and her 2nd amendment right was violated.
From the interview she doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the shed...........lol |
December 27, 2008, 10:29 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2008
Posts: 3,057
|
I live in PA and as others stated she was doing nothing wrong however I heard them mention Philadelphia and having lived there I can say they are the most anti-gun cops around there period. Open carry is legal in Pa "accept for cities of the first class" aka Philly. By all means I cant call Philly a first class city with out laughing to myself, but I'm sure if she was near Philly that's why people felt so strongly against it. I'd like to see the details of how the sheriff exactly took away her handgun, if I knew I was in every legal right I don't think I would simply just hand it to him?
|
December 27, 2008, 10:41 AM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2000
Posts: 4,193
|
Quote:
__________________
Pilot |
|
December 27, 2008, 11:01 AM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2005
Posts: 3,733
|
Quote:
Revoking her permit was wrong and outside the sheriff's powers. The woman is still a moron.
__________________
"Religions are all alike - founded upon fables and mythologies." Thomas Jefferson "The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin |
|
December 27, 2008, 12:25 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 1999
Location: Buckeye Arizona
Posts: 5,526
|
It's time for ropes and lampposts!!
The corrupt government will soon stack the courts against us.
It's time for gun owners to learn the true meaning of the Second Amendment!!
__________________
Ich bin kein Nationalsozialist!!!!!! Ich bin Republikaner!!!!!!!! Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset. Arizona: Flush the Johns!!! |
December 27, 2008, 12:37 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 29, 2001
Location: the lower Susquehanna Valley
Posts: 848
|
Everytime anyone carries openly in a heavily populated area they're making a statement.
If they attract a lot of attention, it's because that's what they wanted to do in the first place. I don't think complaining about it afterwards makes a lot of sense. Me?? I'm not interested in statements. I carry for protection of myself and loved ones. I carry concealed. I think that open carry leaves you tactically dis-advantaged, in the advent of a violent confrontation. I did see a lengthy debate panel that Melanie took part in, and she was an articulate, intelligent spokesperson for the 2A cause. That still doesn't mean I think her mode of carry was very smart.
__________________
Badgers???? We don't need no steenking badgers!!!! |
December 27, 2008, 12:48 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 574
|
If I lived out there I'd get all the parents together and try to get as many as possible to open carry at the soccer game, that would make a statement!
During the interview you could tell she was like a deer in headlights, she was scared to death and had stagefright big time. Don't take that as her not being smart, she was put in the spotlight in front of the whole world and that in itself would make most people freeze up. It doesn't matter if what she did was smart or not, it's her legal right to open carry. If more people open carried the bad guy would be less likely to start a confrontation with anyone in my opinion. I think open carry is smarter than concealed. A bad guy is going to confront people no matter what and I bet he would rather confront someone where no guns are present at all. In fact most of the worst crimes and shooting sprees occur in 'gun free zones'. Just one person carrying in a crowd is going to make all the bad guys think twice before doing something stupid. I applaud this lady, way to go soccer mom! |
December 27, 2008, 12:50 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 2,271
|
Criminals don't acknowledge "gun free" zones. So I don't either. I'm glad she got her gun back and the ego maniacal sheriff should be fired and run out of town.
__________________
Texas, the only State to Have Ever Kicked Another Country's Butt |
December 27, 2008, 01:03 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 574
|
Agreed. We should exersize our rights and fight for them or there will come a time where they will look at open carry and decided that it's obsolete and silently sweep it under the rug.
|
December 27, 2008, 03:54 PM | #23 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 22, 2008
Posts: 416
|
The law enforcement officer has to do whats right and make common sense decisions within their authority.
In this case, she was openly carrying around a group of children at a game. This isnt illegal, but I would say it is suspicious behavior. How many people do you see openly carrying weapons around groups of children? If my children were in that game, then I would be very concerned. The Sheriff should have taken the woman aside and questioned her about this behavior. Checked her identification and ran her for warrants. Then taken the weapon away upon further investigation. When the investigation was completed, then the weapon should have been provided back to her. There are many good reasons to perform a Terry stop in this situation. There are very few times, if any, that the police have ever seen someone openly carrying a pistol at a game full of children. There have been incidents in the past which involved school shootings. She was acting in a suspicious manner by openly carrying the pistol. This is constitutional and what is known as a Terry stop. I dont think the Sheriff should have taken it further, but the weapon should have been taken away and she should have been questioned about this behavior. I would not have concluded the investigation until the game was over If someone was open carrying out on a large multi-acre Texas ranch then the circumstances would be different. Anyone who open carries in an area full of children or populated area should be stopped, questioned and their name checked for warrants. If someone was openly carrying right outside of my residence on the street then my expectation is for police to stop and question that person. I might get some flames for this post, but understand that I support common sense decisions. I believe its common sense to question people who have firearms out openly around children. Last edited by JohnH1963; December 27, 2008 at 04:00 PM. |
December 27, 2008, 03:54 PM | #24 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 6, 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 6
|
My boss CC's on a normal basis and only open carries while he is on his motorcycle. It's because of the "in your face" statement it makes that it's a comfort on the road.
With the exception of that and perhaps a few other circumstances, open carry is not that great an idea.
__________________
I compare a CCW to having a fire extinguisher handy. I don't want to have a fire, but when there is a fire I hope to hell I have the extinguisher to put it out. ~me |
December 27, 2008, 04:17 PM | #25 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 22, 2008
Posts: 416
|
Open carrying a weapon will produce one of three reactions:
1) No reaction 2) A reaction where people want to distance or seperate themselves from you. 3) A reaction where someone wants to get closer and attempt to disarm you. Concealed carrying a weapon, if done legally and in a common sense manner, will not illicit any responses. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|