The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 3, 2009, 09:32 AM   #26
EdInk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2009
Posts: 3,968
There is your answer.
__________________
Sic Semper Tyrannis
EdInk is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 10:24 AM   #27
Venom1956
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 3,656
Damn! Lord of War beat me to it! Here is a link for what its worth. Its a glock for all intents and purposes.

http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg219-e.htm
Venom1956 is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 11:54 AM   #28
wilkup
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2009
Location: Pacific North West
Posts: 190
Anyone had one of these?

Quote:
The one in the picture is AKDAAL GHOST a Turkish made clone of Glock.

Good pistol.
Do you have any other information on this weapon? Have you owned/shot one before?

Last edited by wilkup; December 3, 2009 at 03:57 PM.
wilkup is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 12:01 PM   #29
OcSpeed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2009
Location: the greater unknown
Posts: 123
Interesting, I kinda like the look.

CD's name is usually found on crap, so because he's involved I'd be wary. Maybe it's a good Glock knock off, and if so it would be a fun gun.
OcSpeed is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 04:06 PM   #30
wilkup
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2009
Location: Pacific North West
Posts: 190
I think this is the CD version...?

http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/p...ducts_id/58254
wilkup is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 04:53 PM   #31
aarondhgraham
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2009
Location: Stillwater, OKlahoma
Posts: 8,638
This might help you,,,

I clicked on the "Firearms Photos" link at the top of this page,,,
I came up with this link and it seems to be the one you have pictured.

I hope this helps you,,,
http://www.securityarms.com/20010315.../3300/3385.htm

Aarond
aarondhgraham is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 06:08 PM   #32
LUPUS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2007
Posts: 463
















The pistol is manufactured by AKDAL in Turkey. It resembles the Glock and the Walther P99. The size is approximately just like a G17. The barrel lock up, trigger bar and firing pin safety lever, takedown lever and prosedure, magazine catch lever and its spring, slide catch lever and its spring, striker, its spring and sleeves are just like the Glock, but the other internals are a little bit different.

The frame rails are seperate parts and are not molded in to the frame,
The trigger spring is located in the trigger itself,
There is a seperate sear in the frame located in the trigger group,
The trigger bar detent plate and its spring are also a seperate parts,
The pistol has a single action-only trigger system,
The extrator and its spring are in their traditional arrengement, similar to P99,
Unfortunately the magazines are not interchangeable with Glock mags.










Last edited by LUPUS; December 3, 2009 at 09:20 PM.
LUPUS is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 06:26 PM   #33
LordofWar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2009
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 646
Yes. I bought one and fired about 2000 rounds in a single day without a single hiccup. Accuracy is at par with the Glock. I found recoil to be consideraby lower than a Glock 19.

It's also in use by the Turkish special forces.
LordofWar is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 06:37 PM   #34
LUPUS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2007
Posts: 463
Quote:
It's also in use by the Turkish special forces.
I must say that this information is completely wrong. TSFs' main pistol is the SIG Sauer P226 while they can choose any kind of sidearm according to the mission. The regular service pistol was the Beretta 92 in the Turkish Armed Forces for a while which is replaced by mainly Sarsılmaz pistols followed by the Yavuz pistols manufactured by GİRSAN which are also another Beretta 92 knock off and the Zigana pistols manufactured by TİSAŞ. But none of the pistols manufactured by AKDAL are accepted in service until now.

Regards.

Last edited by LUPUS; December 3, 2009 at 08:35 PM.
LUPUS is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 07:58 PM   #35
sserdlihc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2008
Location: S.C.
Posts: 1,454
The picture Lupus posted looks alot better. It doesn't look cheap at all. Looks like a nice handgun. The 02 slide is different and it has adjustable backstrap. Not bad looking at all. I am now interested.
__________________
Familiarity breeds contempt, while rarity wins admiration. Aupleius
If someone doesn't like you, that's their problem! Milton Childress
sserdlihc is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 08:09 PM   #36
wilkup
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2009
Location: Pacific North West
Posts: 190
LUPUS:

Do you own this gun? I'm wondering what you think of it and if you have fired it? I like the pics of it's evolution and what it looks like broken down. Thanks for your help.

Also, after hearing that Charles Daily is known for sub par products - Is your gun from them and if so... What's your take on it?
wilkup is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 08:43 PM   #37
varoadking
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2004
Location: Dixie
Posts: 2,315
Quote:
Not knowing that much about Charles Daily...
Daly...and they are well known as purveyors of crap...
varoadking is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 08:49 PM   #38
LUPUS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2007
Posts: 463
Quote:
Do you own this gun? I'm wondering what you think of it and if you have fired it?
I do not own this pistol, but I had a chance to fire once when it is first introduced. The first prototypes had some bugs concerning the finish, magazine catch lever and trigger pull quality that had to be worked out. But the pistol has been evolving since then and as I heard from the owners of the recent examples, they are satisfactorly reliable with much better trigger pulls and finish. But since I did not have a chance to examine and shoot the recent examples, I can not give any comment from the first hand.
LUPUS is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 02:14 AM   #39
north
Junior Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2009
Posts: 5
I had some experiance with new CD9. As a drawback, trigger pulling feels may effect the user first. As positive aspect its ergonomy. On the other hand, when the US market will meet the CD9, I'll be waiting detailed feedbacks with thousends of different type ammos.
north is offline  
Old December 5, 2009, 03:22 PM   #40
Te Anau
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2004
Location: Somewhere south of the No
Posts: 3,824
Quote:
CD's name is usually found on crap, so because he's involved I'd be wary
Quote:
Daly...and they are well known as purveyors of crap...
I totally disagree.Charles Daly has imported some very nice guns in recent memory.I dare you to tell me that both of my DDA's are "crap" or say anything else bad about them.I have one in .45acp & one in .40S&W and both have been excellent guns and are well made.CD's recent imports of the TZ-99 clone and Hi-Power copy are excellent guns as well.To put out a blanket statement claiming that anything with Charles Daly on it is "crap" is ridiculous.
__________________
"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." --American author Mark Twain (1835-1910)
Te Anau is offline  
Old December 5, 2009, 04:45 PM   #41
Dust Monkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2007
Posts: 723
CD imports the Bul M5 double stack 1911. That M5 was so much a piece of crap that Kimber bought the lowers to make their double stack from. Just because CD "imports" a product does not mean it's a bad product.

I remember when glocks came out. The same things said about the Ghost was said about glock. Glock lovers are just peeved that other gun companies are taking the polymer route and expanding on it while the basic design of a glock has not changed.

Makers like walther with the P99, HK with the HK45/P30, and SW with the MP series will continue to draw more customers due to the options in backstraps and better ergonomics.
__________________
Civilian Date: 14 Century
1 : a specialist in Roman or modern civil law.
If you are not subject to the UCMJ, you are a Civilian. I don't care one bit what updated dictionaries say.
Dust Monkey is offline  
Old December 5, 2009, 04:53 PM   #42
Threeman
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 24, 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 13
I like the fact that it doesn't have the word tactical on it.

"Ghost" now that's a cool name.
Threeman is offline  
Old December 5, 2009, 04:54 PM   #43
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
Ask yourself this one question: Would you buy a car made in Turkey?
gyvel is offline  
Old December 6, 2009, 09:37 PM   #44
wilkup
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2009
Location: Pacific North West
Posts: 190
Quote:
Ask yourself this one question: Would you buy a car made in Turkey?
I'm failing to see the parallel between cars manufactured in Turkey verses firearms... Is there really any possible way to make such a comparison?

I'm actually on neither side as far as the firearms quality from this manufacturer, but I would expect that anyone who offers their opinion actually presents themself with a logical and sound argument; not argumentative comments or blanket statements just to get their two cents in.

Last edited by wilkup; December 6, 2009 at 09:53 PM.
wilkup is offline  
Old December 6, 2009, 09:50 PM   #45
DocDizz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2008
Posts: 257
What's the big deal? A ton of people love plastic guns that are made in Croatia (see XD). Maybe if Smith & Wesson were to start importing it as the XXX-DD it, too, would have a cult following?

In all honesty, I'll sit on the sidelines. I'm content with my metal guns and their primitive "DA/SA and SA" mechanisms, that are even so primitive as to use a HAMMER.
DocDizz is offline  
Old December 7, 2009, 04:39 AM   #46
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
Quote:
I'm failing to see the parallel between cars manufactured in Turkey verses firearms... Is there really any possible way to make such a comparison?
The parallel is that you are buying something from a country that has less-than-stellar industrial capability.
gyvel is offline  
Old December 7, 2009, 05:14 AM   #47
earlthegoat2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2009
Location: Lowcountry
Posts: 373
Who cares about if anyone has heard of this pistol. Has anyone heard of this?

This was from the Wikipedia entry linked at the beginning of the thread.

Quote:
The rounds in the magazine are double stacked which means that they are less likely to jam, as sometimes occurs in fully loaded single stacked magazines, due to increased pressure on the spring.
What??

Quote:
CD's name is usually found on crap, so because he's involved I'd be wary
Quote:
Daly...and they are well known as purveyors of crap...
As a general rule this is true of all manufactures and importers. There are some good but mostly bad firearms from all of them. In CDs case they imported some excellent Miroku made shotguns as well as some very good BHP clones that were actually assembled and fitted by Dan Wesson and Magnum research. They imported the Jercho/Baby Eagle family of pistols for a time as well as an Isreali made polymer framed 1911. (it was a good gun but you know how poly 1911s go).

I tend to think of Charles Daly as an importer responsible for bringing lesser known but still quality firearms into this country. Like I said earlier though, most of their stuff is crap but so is Smith and Wesson's.
__________________
I say take off the warning labels and let them sort themselves out.
earlthegoat2 is offline  
Old December 8, 2009, 02:11 AM   #48
team101
Member
 
Join Date: October 7, 2009
Posts: 36
Quote:
I love how the Glock fans call it cheap looking and would not buy one The ergonomics are far superior to Glock.
That is subjective. I think most would buy a Glock over this piece simply because the Glock is a proven design, has a huge selection of aftermarket accessories, excellent factory support, and Glock will most likely be around in 5, 10, 20 years while this thing may be the Yugo of the gun world in a few years.

Quote:
What's the big deal? A ton of people love plastic guns that are made in Croatia (see XD).
How loved was the XD when is wasn't the XD. The nearly identical HS2000 commonly sold for 299.00 and was a pretty big failure on the US market. Stamp it Springfield XD, raise the pice $200, and it is a hit? Gotta love branding and marketing.

Last edited by team101; December 8, 2009 at 04:36 AM.
team101 is offline  
Old December 8, 2009, 05:12 PM   #49
HKFan9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2008
Posts: 3,057
I'm a pretty strong believer in you pay for what you get. I would spend the extra money and go with a trusted big name company such as Glock. Why? because who knows how long this other company will be in business for? Who knows how to work on these guns? Who keeps parts in stock for them? Can you walk into a local store and get holsters/Mag's for this weapon?


And I'm not a Glock cult follower, I own 1 G17 that fills what I needed it to.
HKFan9 is offline  
Old December 8, 2009, 10:45 PM   #50
DocDizz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2008
Posts: 257
Everybody knows that when you spend more on something it's going to be better, right?

My Kimber that I paid $700 for had FAR more problems than the piece of **** CHEAP $500 CZ I traded it for, which has yet to give me a problem on par with anything that happened with the Kimber).

And really, what's Charles Daly doing so much worse than EAA?
DocDizz is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09324 seconds with 7 queries