Need your help for CPHV.com site check

John/az2 · May 17, 2001, 03:53 PM

For the last couple of days I have been working on a re-design of the http://www.cphv.com site to make it more user friendly and accessable. I felt that it was time to take the "high"

road in web design as opposed to http://www.cphv.org.

Because I can not test for all browsers, resolutions, configurations, I am asking you for your help.

I have much of the site completed, but there are a few broken links and non-links to stuff that there will be links to.

If you are so inclined, please drop by http://www.cphv.com/2ndrevision/index.htm and post your honest evaluation of layout, graphics, and material, as well as things you would like to see.

[Edited by John/az2 on 05-17-2001 at 06:04 PM]

scud · May 17, 2001, 06:34 PM

Looks good to me John, only thing I'd add is a small text under the navigation buttons on top so it's easier to see what they link too. I couldn't figure out where the icons went by view alone. Format was good on my comp, 1280 X 1024 IE 5.0

John/az2 · May 18, 2001, 02:36 AM

Thanks, Scud!

...at least I know of one person that cares... (sniff)

Dex56 · May 18, 2001, 06:48 AM

Hi--
Netscape 4.72, 1024x768, looks good from here.

Dex

2GSP · May 18, 2001, 08:14 AM

John,

Formats and loads fine on Netscape 4.77 @ 1024x768.

I like the layout, clean and straight forward. I'm sure you know that the "Links" link is broken [404 file not found error].

I didn't care for the shadow affect on your header gif file. To me it looks muted, or fuzzy might describe it better.
Maybe a bigger font would look better. The side graphics looked great and all the pages I loaded were fast.

Hope this helps,
-Mike

John/az2 · May 18, 2001, 09:21 PM

The new site is up and running.

Still under construction, though.

http://www.cphv.com

Justin · May 19, 2001, 12:07 AM

John-

Looks good on IE v.5 running at a resolution 1152x864.

Monkeyleg · May 19, 2001, 05:04 PM

Looks good at 1024x768 as well as higher resolutions, John. Great job.

Dick

**Rob Pincus** · May 19, 2001, 05:10 PM

Site looks great and is an excellent source of information... Thanks.

John/az2 · May 20, 2001, 10:28 AM

Thanks for your help guys.

If it helps turn some fence-sitters, it's been well worth my time.

May 17, 2001, 03:53 PM	#1
John/az2 Senior Member Join Date: February 18, 1999 Location: Arizona Posts: 2,754	For the last couple of days I have been working on a re-design of the http://www.cphv.com site to make it more user friendly and accessable. I felt that it was time to take the "high" road in web design as opposed to http://www.cphv.org. Because I can not test for all browsers, resolutions, configurations, I am asking you for your help. I have much of the site completed, but there are a few broken links and non-links to stuff that there will be links to. If you are so inclined, please drop by http://www.cphv.com/2ndrevision/index.htm and post your honest evaluation of layout, graphics, and material, as well as things you would like to see. [Edited by John/az2 on 05-17-2001 at 06:04 PM] __________________ John/az Six Blind Sheep \| The Publishing Site \| Online Product Reviews

May 18, 2001, 02:36 AM	#3
John/az2 Senior Member Join Date: February 18, 1999 Location: Arizona Posts: 2,754	Thanks, Scud! ...at least I know of one person that cares... (sniff) __________________ John/az Six Blind Sheep \| The Publishing Site \| Online Product Reviews

May 18, 2001, 09:21 PM	#6
John/az2 Senior Member Join Date: February 18, 1999 Location: Arizona Posts: 2,754	Thanks guys! The new site is up and running. Still under construction, though. http://www.cphv.com __________________ John/az Six Blind Sheep \| The Publishing Site \| Online Product Reviews

May 20, 2001, 10:28 AM	#10
John/az2 Senior Member Join Date: February 18, 1999 Location: Arizona Posts: 2,754	Thanks for your help guys. If it helps turn some fence-sitters, it's been well worth my time. __________________ John/az Six Blind Sheep \| The Publishing Site \| Online Product Reviews

May 17, 2001, 06:34 PM	#2
scud Senior Member Join Date: February 4, 2000 Location: Tampa FL Posts: 1,055	Looks good to me John, only thing I'd add is a small text under the navigation buttons on top so it's easier to see what they link too. I couldn't figure out where the icons went by view alone. Format was good on my comp, 1280 X 1024 IE 5.0

May 18, 2001, 06:48 AM	#4
Dex56 Member Join Date: March 12, 2001 Location: Virginia Posts: 18	Hi-- Netscape 4.72, 1024x768, looks good from here. Dex

May 18, 2001, 08:14 AM	#5
2GSP Member Join Date: November 8, 2000 Location: Upstate New York Posts: 87	John, Formats and loads fine on Netscape 4.77 @ 1024x768. I like the layout, clean and straight forward. I'm sure you know that the "Links" link is broken [404 file not found error]. I didn't care for the shadow affect on your header gif file. To me it looks muted, or fuzzy might describe it better. Maybe a bigger font would look better. The side graphics looked great and all the pages I loaded were fast. Hope this helps, -Mike

May 19, 2001, 12:07 AM	#7
Justin Senior Member Join Date: October 24, 2000 Location: Colorado Springs Posts: 1,641	John- Looks good on IE v.5 running at a resolution 1152x864.

May 19, 2001, 05:04 PM	#8
Monkeyleg Senior Member Join Date: January 25, 2000 Posts: 4,621	Looks good at 1024x768 as well as higher resolutions, John. Great job. Dick

May 19, 2001, 05:10 PM	#9
Rob Pincus Staff Join Date: October 9, 1998 Location: CO Posts: 3,573	Site looks great and is an excellent source of information... Thanks.