The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 12, 2002, 03:20 PM   #1
QuadOughtBuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2002
Posts: 120
Buckshot for Bear Defense

Which of these three loads would you use for Brown Bear Defense and Why?

Estate SWAT 2 ¾” 9 Pellet 00 Patterns
29 yrds: 6”x 7.5”
29 yrds: 10”x 10”
29 yrds: 6”x 6.5”
29 yrds: 12”x 10” (7”x6” minus flyer)
29 yrds: 6”x 3.5” ***(7 pellets in a 2”x2” area WOW!)***
42 yrds: 7 pellets on paper in a 10”x17.5” area (two flyers off paper)
42 yrds: 16.5”x 24” (9.5”x 12” minus 2 flyers)
42 yrds: 13”x 14”
Average 29 yrd ( - flyer): 7”x 6.7” ****Tightest Patterning Load of the Bunch!!!
Average 42 yrd: 14.75”x 19”

Velocities
1,166 fps
1,124 fps
1,140 fps
1,136 fps
1,152 fps
Average: 1,144 fps
486 grains @ 1,144 fps –1,413 ft/lbs (157 per pellet)


Nitro 3 ½” 12 Pellet 0000 (.38 caliber pellets)
29 yrds: 18”x 12”
29 yrds: 6”x 27” (6”x 14” minus flyer)
29 yrds: 16”x 7” (16”x 26” minus 2 flyers)
42 yrds: 7 pellets on paper in a 17”x 26” area
Average 29 yrd ( - flyer): 13.3”x 15.3”

Velocities
1,137 fps
1,141 fps
1,135 fps
1,142 fps
Average: 1,140 fps
[b]960 grains @ 1,140 fps –2,770 ft/lbs (231 per pellet)[b]



Winchester XX 2 ¾” 12 Pellet 00
15 yrds: 6”x 7”
15 yrds: 6”x 8” (6”x2”minus flyer)
29 yrds: 16”x 10” *(5 pellets center of aim in a 4”x2.5” area!)
29 yrds: 14”x 14”
29 yrds: 15”x 10” *(6 pellets (50%) center of aim in a 4”x4.5” area!)
29 yrds: 15”x 11”
29 yrds: 11”x 10” (6.5”x 9” minus flyer)
29 yrds: 12”x 16” (8 pellets in a 6”x 6” area)
42 yrds: 16”x 22”
42 yrds: 21”x 19”
42 yrds: 20”x 19”
42 yrds: 20”x 18”
60 yrds: (4 pellets on paper, further 60 yrd shots discontinued)
Average 15 yrd (- flyer): 6”x 7.5”
Average 29 yrd (- flyer): 13”x 11.5”
Average 42 yrd: 19.25”x 19.5”

Velocities
1,207 fps
1,221 fps
1,231 fps
1,219 fps
1,226 fps
Average: 1,221 fps
648 grains @ 1,221 fps –2,145 ft/lbs (179 per pellet)
QuadOughtBuck is offline  
Old September 12, 2002, 03:51 PM   #2
buzz_knox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 1999
Location: Knoxville, in the Free State of Tennesse
Posts: 4,190
How about none of the above? I would think that if I were dealing with browns, I would want the hardest slug I could find with the most energy I could pack into it. With a brown, you need penetration into the vitals/CNS more than saturation effect, unless you want to shoot into their face at pointblank range. I just don't see buck being able to do sufficient damage to their infrastructure at moderate ranges to stop an attack.
buzz_knox is offline  
Old September 12, 2002, 04:04 PM   #3
Jamie Young
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2000
Location: SE/PA
Posts: 4,834
My best friend was charged by a Black Bear while opening the back door of his cabin.


He opened the back door of his cabin at 8am with his dog standing next to him. His dog smelled something and started barking. The next thing you know, a 6ft black bear came tearing around the corner and went straight for him and the dog. The dog intercepted the bear about 10ft in front of him. For almost 30min the dog and the bear fought each other in the woods about 25yds from him. My friend had an 870 with buckshot but was afraid to take a shot at the bear because he was afraid of hitting the dog. Amazingly the dog wore the bear down and the bear took off. The golden retriever ran circles around the bear and kept biting him the butt.

What do you do if you have to use that gun in defense of another person? What would you do if the bear was chewing on someone and you wanted to shoot it in the head?
__________________
Find out about Gun Shows and Training activities.
www.TheRallyPoint.org
Get your gun club involved!!
Jamie Young is offline  
Old September 12, 2002, 04:50 PM   #4
QuadOughtBuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2002
Posts: 120
LOL, that musta been one sissy bear.
QuadOughtBuck is offline  
Old September 12, 2002, 05:08 PM   #5
Jamie Young
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2000
Location: SE/PA
Posts: 4,834
Well, if you had someone biting you in the rear, for half an hour, and you never could catch the bugger, wouldn't you go home?
__________________
Find out about Gun Shows and Training activities.
www.TheRallyPoint.org
Get your gun club involved!!
Jamie Young is offline  
Old September 12, 2002, 07:26 PM   #6
labgrade
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 29, 1999
Location: west of a small town, CO
Posts: 4,346
Wasn't it Keith Rogan who said that 00 buck was the preferred load? I disremember ....

At self defense ranges, and you're not likely to even see one about to getcha much past 10 yards or so, if that, the buckshot will be a solid mass? as such the common wisdom goes .....

Beats me. I never hunted the bigguns & really have no desire, but as with the really big piggies, I'd want something big & solid all the better to break 'em down - screw killin' 'em - I just don't want 'em gettin' anywhere close. Killing's for later.

I'm a wuss that way.
labgrade is offline  
Old September 12, 2002, 09:18 PM   #7
lilbiggun
Member
 
Join Date: November 16, 2001
Location: los anchorage, alaska
Posts: 61
I agree with none of the above. Give me a good rifle and I'll be happy.
lilbiggun is offline  
Old September 12, 2002, 11:45 PM   #8
QuadOughtBuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2002
Posts: 120
Like what? An M1 Garand with soft points?
QuadOughtBuck is offline  
Old September 13, 2002, 12:01 AM   #9
Turk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 30, 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 517
I agree none of the above. If you've got a 12 ga. go with with a slug. Even if you're close in and the pellets stay together you'll still get deflection off bones. I want to break bones and put the bear down.

Turk
Turk is offline  
Old September 13, 2002, 12:45 AM   #10
lilbiggun
Member
 
Join Date: November 16, 2001
Location: los anchorage, alaska
Posts: 61
M1 with soft points...ummm, I dont think so. I wouldnt mind having one but I wont carry it for bears.
lilbiggun is offline  
Old September 13, 2002, 12:47 AM   #11
Sundance
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2001
Posts: 836
I have 2 things to say...

1) It is called buck shot not bear shot for a good reason. Go with the hardest hitting deepest penetrating slug you can find.

2) Maybe it wasn't a sissy bear. Maybe it was just one helluva dog. Never underestimate the value of a good dog.
Sundance is offline  
Old September 13, 2002, 09:45 AM   #12
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
I feel fortunate that I have never had to deal with a Very Large Something with Lots Of Teeth. However, it occurs to me that if I had reasonable expectation to do so, I would practice shooting from the hip--or other awkward postition--and in doing so quite rapidly. And accurately, of course.

Shotgun with slugs, .45-70 Guide Gun sort of critter, semi-auto in '06 or better...Something you can put into action very, very quickly and having lots of "Thump!".

What you don't have, from what I have read, is a lot of time to think about what to do. Sorta like dealing with a very hostile Street Ape, only worse.

Art
Art Eatman is offline  
Old September 13, 2002, 11:23 AM   #13
QuadOughtBuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2002
Posts: 120
"M1 with soft points...ummm, I dont think so. I wouldnt mind having one but I wont carry it for bears."

So you guys don't think buckshot or a .30-06 is enough for stopping bears....hmmmmmm. Remember way back in the day when man killed about ever beast with a muzzle loader, or not even going that far back when the .30-.30 was the prefered round on even big bears? I think that as modern Americans we have been so caught up in the magnum hysteria that we think we NEED ultra insane powerful cartridges to put down things we had little trouble putting down in the past. With that being said, the 12 gauge and .30-06 is NOT a weak round, they are extremly powerful and both will easily take a bear.

Also, I don't understand how I can ask for a choice, and be offered a different answer? If I ask which icecream shop I should go to, and someone says "no, you don't want that, comrade, you want pizza!!" I don't want pizza, I made it plain that I want icecream!!
QuadOughtBuck is offline  
Old September 13, 2002, 11:33 AM   #14
buzz_knox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 1999
Location: Knoxville, in the Free State of Tennesse
Posts: 4,190
If you want to run down that scenario, carry a .22. That's what professional bear hunters used to do. Please ignore the fact that they used dogs to tree the bear or terrain to their advantage and then shot them below the chin, straight into the brain. As for needing "ultra insane" rounds when we were dealing with them easily enough, get real please. Man killed bear with spears too. So, why not pack that instead? Ignore the fact that the bear population was reduced through attrition (i.e. more of us than them so we could afford casualties).

As for getting a different answer, none of the above is always implied when you ask for a choice.
buzz_knox is offline  
Old September 13, 2002, 12:50 PM   #15
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
Quad, seems to me there's a significant difference between hunting for bears and taking a careful shot at some distance, and being in a self-defense situation. This latter is up close and personal, and time to a "Stop!" is of the essence.

Now, if all you have is buckshot, then about all I would advise is to deliver as much as you can as quick as you can and as centered as possible...

Art
Art Eatman is offline  
Old September 13, 2002, 05:32 PM   #16
stinger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2001
Location: west texas
Posts: 772
Methinks that buckshot for self-defense against bears would be downright effective. Shotguns dump a lot of energy into a target, and at self-defense ranges it would act very similar to a 70 cal rifle.

That dog story reminded me of a golden retriever that I once had. He got into a very similar fight with a horse. Scary, but funny. But it sure wasn't a bear


Stinger
stinger is offline  
Old September 13, 2002, 07:12 PM   #17
Field-dressed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 21, 2000
Location: Alaska
Posts: 148
I work for the Alaska Dept of F&G. Our policy on using shotguns for bear protection is premium slugs only. Buckshot doesn't have the necessary penetration to anchor or kill a charging bear, nor do cheap pumpkin ball slugs for that matter. I personally use a 45-70 with hard cast bullets for coastal brownies.
Field-dressed is offline  
Old September 13, 2002, 10:13 PM   #18
Sundance
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2001
Posts: 836
I have 3 guns in my dangerous animal defense inventory:

1) Ruger Super Blackhawk .44 Magnum 4 5/8"

2) Remington 870 Marine Magnum 12 gauge

3) Marlin 1895 Stainless Guide Gun (Unported) .45-70

Pistol and Rifle loaded with heavy hardcast with lots of gusto

Shotgun loaded with premium slugs

Would love to supplement the SBH .44 with a .454 Casull or .475 Linebaugh...
Sundance is offline  
Old September 14, 2002, 03:23 AM   #19
QuadOughtBuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2002
Posts: 120
What do you guys mean by "premium slugs"? Can I have some types and brand names listed here? How would you consider the 3" brenneke magnum? One of the gunstop commandos said "Oh...you can't use that on a bear, you need this" and pointed to the copper solid slugs. Gun shop commandos....sigh, I once had one tell me that the FAL was much more accurate than the M14, and more reliable too.


In my opinion the 3" brenneke is the most powerful slug there is. Followed by the Winchester partion gold, which of course no one can afford, so brennekes it is.
QuadOughtBuck is offline  
Old September 15, 2002, 02:49 AM   #20
MitchSchaft
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 19, 2001
Posts: 1,197
I'm curious as to why you keep pushing the shotgun idea.
MitchSchaft is offline  
Old September 15, 2002, 11:11 AM   #21
Jamie Young
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2000
Location: SE/PA
Posts: 4,834
I've always brought my SKS there for SD. My nephew didn't want to walk around the area because he heard about all the bear stories. I bought him a Red Ryder BB gun to carry around. He feels safe now.
__________________
Find out about Gun Shows and Training activities.
www.TheRallyPoint.org
Get your gun club involved!!
Jamie Young is offline  
Old September 15, 2002, 02:03 PM   #22
Keith Rogan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 1999
Location: Kodiak, Alaska
Posts: 1,014
A couple of points.

First, it doesn't matter what kind of patterns you get at 25+ yards, because if you are shooting that far away you're hunting, not defending yourself from a bear. It's only TV and movie bears that stand up at long range and roar before charging (there's probably rare exceptions to that...). Most real bear attack occurs when you enter the bears safety envelope of 15 or 20 FEET and the bear busts out of his bed or away from the gamey elk he's dining on and charges without warning.
Secondly, because (ideally), you want to make a brain shot, it's far more important that your shot charge shoots to point of aim than what kind of pattern it makes. I did some experiments with close range shooting (5-10 yards) with various buck shot loads and slugs, and for some reason (recoil?) most loads went several inches high. I was surprised because standard field loads shoot right under the bead. It would be bad news if one simply scored the top of a bears head and back instead of making a big ragged hole in the center of its face.
I do think that heavy buckshot (at the very close ranges we're talking about) would be sufficient for big bears. I carry a .45/70 GG, but that's just a personal preference. I think a shotgun makes a lot of sense for many people, after all, a shotgun is designed for quick, instinctive point shooting and this is what we're talking about here. If I was using a shotgun, I would just hinge the decision to use slugs or buckshot on what lands directly under that front bead at under ten yards. None of us are going to remember to hold "low" or "high" when a bear busts out of the brush and charges. You'll only get one chance.
__________________
Keith
Keith Rogan is offline  
Old September 15, 2002, 11:44 PM   #23
QuadOughtBuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2002
Posts: 120
Good point, I will check POA impact at 3 yards -15yrds.
QuadOughtBuck is offline  
Old September 16, 2002, 12:36 AM   #24
Zorro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 28, 2000
Posts: 1,072
12 Gauge Brenneke Slugs, and aim for the nose.

Next step up is a .458 Winchester Magnum.
Zorro is offline  
Old September 16, 2002, 09:27 PM   #25
CWL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 23, 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,576
Solid copper will penetrate.
CWL is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07182 seconds with 8 queries