November 13, 2002, 08:35 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: January 9, 2002
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 28
|
Cs45
Who has one of these. I am seriously thinking of getting one and would like to have input from those who own one and has put more than just a few rounds through it....thanks
__________________
Art in SC |
November 13, 2002, 10:57 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 6, 2001
Location: California
Posts: 3,020
|
try a search on the topic, the 'CS' line of S&W guns is a fairly common topic.
|
November 13, 2002, 04:33 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 11, 1999
Location: GA
Posts: 1,749
|
Quote:
So in an attempt to be neighborly to a relatively new member, I ran a search of "CS9 or CS40 or http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/...der=descending Now, if you want STRICTLY info on the I agree, the Chief's Special autos appear to have potential. If the new S&W P99 compact isn't all I'm hoping it to be, I'll be forking out for a CS40 myself.
__________________
Yes Rico... KaBOOM! |
|
November 13, 2002, 10:28 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2000
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 100
|
Bought a
Trigger is kind of sloppy. Sights are good, F&F are excellent, gun is a bit blocky, though. Overall, I'm happy with it for the price I paid - $420 NIB on sale.
__________________
NRA Endowment Life Member NRA Instructor, Basic Pistol SAF Life Member AzCDL Member |
November 13, 2002, 11:26 PM | #5 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,380
|
A bit blocky?
That's like saying Rosie is a bit fat, or Dan Rather is a bit biased!
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
November 14, 2002, 03:07 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2002
Location: northern CA for a little while longer
Posts: 1,931
|
Yeah, there are several good threads on this pistol in both this forum, and the S&W forum ...
http://www.smith-wessonforum.com/cgi...i?action=intro A friend and I bought a couple of the early Too tight of a tolerance ... imagine that ... instead of too sloppy, they went the other direction and made a tolerance too tight ... apparently because they wanted to maximize the accuracy, according to what I was told. The only other issue was related to some very early magazines where the secondary "dimple", behind and below the primary magazine lip indentation, were done by hand by a contract vendor in the beginning. Slight variances of placement of these small indentations created some problems with how the rounds moved upward during recoil in some magazines. This situation was quickly corrected with new production methods, and any problematic magazines were replaced. I've watched quite a few newer There's more detail posted in some of the threads ... and there's some very happy comments from new owners of this fine little pistol ... I haven't found any ammunition mine doesn't like, but then I primarily shoot standard pressure 230gr loads. It balances well while firing, even though it feels "blocky" and "squarish" to many people, just holding it in the hand ... and it's more accurate than a mini .45 pistol has a right to be. It's not "pretty" ... but it's very, very functional. Try searching through the S&W forum semiauto pistol threads. This little pistol is winning over quite a few skeptics. Still ugly enough to almost be cute, though ... What annoys me about the I guess pretty is, as pretty does ... sometimes, anyway. |
November 14, 2002, 08:00 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: January 9, 2002
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 28
|
CS 45
Thanks for the replies. I'm not totally sold on the CS yet but I am SERIOUSLY looking toward a .45 small and light enough to carry fairly comfortably. There's always the Glock 36 but then there's that trigger safety that puts me off..... and the looks of the thing. I know, I know.... they work. I gotta spend this money soon..before I use it for some foolish purpose like food or bills or gas.
__________________
Art in SC |
November 14, 2002, 10:20 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: January 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 59
|
Art708: I spent the better part of this year doing what you are doing right now... looking for the perfect .45 in a small, usable package. Basically, you have the following choices: 1) Compact 1911s - Like the Kimber Ultra Carry, these little guns are based on the 1911 format, are SA, and can be carried in Condition 1. They are very good for CCW use and they are also expensive. Condition 1 always made me nervous... even in the jungle with a flapped holster. 2) Glock 36 - Great shooting, reliable, concealable, good price range. Unfortunately, it's a Glock and people either love 'em or hate 'em. I'm in the latter group. I just don't like the trigger or firing pin mechanisms. 3) Para-Ordnance 6.45 LDA - Oh, man, I thought long and hard about this one. It seems like the perfect solution. It's a tad on the expensive side of the scale, but it's got a trigger that's smooth as silk, it's DAO, it's a good shooter, and P-O is developing a good reputation for reliability and service. Plus, it just looks good! I finally said No to this option because of the weight (it just feels heavy on the belt) and because the DA trigger felt too light to be comfortably safe. 4) SIG P245 - Close... almost a buy. I have carried a SIG P220 since it was first imported as a BDA 45 and everything I looked at was compared to my P220 as far as accuracy, reliability, and handling were concerned. The P245 is an excellent package and a really good shooter. It just didn't quite feel right in my hands. 5) S&W Good luck with your search. Mac
__________________
McKamie |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|