[Santino]

I'll get right to the point.......an anti friend of mine asked me where I would draw the line in regards to what kind of ARMS civilians should be able to lawfully own.
I'll be honest, the question confused me a bit and made me think.
I would like to ask TFL'ers to look up the definitin of arms and let me know what you think is the limit as to what type of arms should be available to the public.
I'm not trying to be a wise guy or anything but by definition ARMS includes alot of things.
Some ARMS do not belong in the hands of anybody who wishes to own them ..........or do they?
Give me your opinion,and try to be serious.

P.S. I recomend that you look up the definition of ARMS before you post.