April 5, 1999, 04:07 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 1999
Location: White Mountains, AZ & Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Posts: 663
|
Scientific American Aprill 1999
Weaponry TAKING BALLISTICS BY STORM An electronic gun with no mechanical parts fires a million rounds per minute by Dan Drollette in Canberra, Australia "When you first hear of a gun without any moving mechanical parts, you tend to laugh. I know I had to withhold my giggles," recalls physicist Adam Drobot of Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a company based in San Diego that evaluates new technologies. "But once you see the videotape of this test-firing, the giggle factor goes away." The gun in question is something that even its inventor says comes out of left field. Termed Metal Storm, the weapon has no hammer, no trigger, no breechblock and no shell casings to eject. Equally unusual, a single barrel fires at a rate equivalent to one million rounds per minute. In comparison, the fastest conventional firearms (Gatling guns) fire only 6,000 rounds per minute. Metal Storm's origins are unorthodox as well. It was invented by former grocery wholesaler Mike O'Dwyer, a lone Australian tinkerer with no formal education in ballistics or engineering. His previous patents are for devices such as air-cooled sneakers. ("They pump air through as you jog," he explains.) Yet after 15 years of trial and error in his tropical Queensland home, O'Dwyer came up with a gun prototype that recently fired 180 rounds of nine-millimeter bullets in 0.01 second during a demonstration before military officials in Adelaide. Metal Storm's bullets leave its barrel so quickly that they are only microseconds apart--when one bullet is flying through the air, the next is just 10 centimeters (four inches) behind. For current machine guns, the gap between bullets is 30 meters. "It could replace our existing technology on the battlefield," says Maj. David Goyne, a weapons specialist at Australian Defense Headquarters. The gun is ideal for close-in situations, such as defending ships against incoming missiles. Goyne comments that it could also eliminate land mines in open areas such as Kuwait's deserts: a helicopter using the gun could hover above the sands and clear a minefield by spraying it from a distance, exploding mines harmlessly. The gun works through a combination of specially designed bullets and an electronic firing mechanism, which O'Dwyer describes as "a barrel tube with an electrical wire attached." Jacketless bullets are lined up inside, nose to tail, and are separated from one another by a layer of propellant. When an electric current makes its way down the strip, the bullets are set off one by one. To stop them from going off simultaneously--a problem previously encountered when putting many bullets in a single barrel--O'Dwyer designed the bullets to work together. The high pressure caused by the firing of the first projectile makes the nose of the next one in line swell against the walls, temporarily sealing off the rest of the barrel. (In ballistics terms, the nose of the second bullet effectively acts as a breechblock to prevent an uncontrolled sympathetic ignition.) After the first bullet exits, the pressure drops, and the nose of the second one loosens up, enabling the bullet to be fired. This process continues for each successive bullet. Other than the projectiles themselves, there are no moving parts. To get even more firepower, several loaded barrels can be set up side by side. Once a barrel is used up, it can be discarded or sent back to the factory for reloading. Variations of electrically fired weapons have been tried before. For instance, Sandia National Laboratories developed an electromagnetic coil gun designed to hurl 100-kilogram (220-pound) satellites into orbit. But a number of differences separate the two approaches, observes Vinod Puri, senior research scientist with the Australian Defense Science and Technology Organization: "The electromagnetic coil gun demands lots of energy, achieves high velocities and sends large objects great distances. In contrast, Metal Storm requires less energy, works at lower velocities, uses normal gun propellant and sends out more, smaller projectiles per minute for shorter distances." O'Dwyer points out another feature of guns like Metal Storm: because electronics are such an integral part of their makeup, they offer a good opportunity for built-in electronic safeguards, such as security keypads. If an unauthorized user tried to bypass the gun's security system by disabling the electronics, the gun simply couldn't fire. The device has many nonmilitary uses, too, Drobot notes. A slower version could replace the nail guns used by carpenters and roofers and may find a use in riveting and other industrial applications. Goyne remarks that the technology still needs fine-tuning--it fires relatively small caliber bullets, for example. But physicists such as Puri say its basic design is "very solid." The Australian Trade Commission is promoting the weapon, which has attracted attention in Australia and Britain. In the U.S., General Dynamics has tested it, and SAIC has been contracted to help develop it further. A. Fenner Milton, previously in charge of weapons acquisition for the U.S. Army and now running the army's night-vision lab, attended a test-firing of a Metal Storm prototype in Australia last year. "In my opinion, Metal Storm represents a truly innovative approach to lethality, that if further developed has great potential for defensive weapon systems that can take advantage of its extraordinarily high burst rate of fire," an impressed Milton says. What seems to surprise most experts about the technology is its source. "It sometimes takes someone who isn't very conventional to come up with new ideas," Drobot observes. "My amazement is at the process--O'Dwyer didn't blow up a barrel or kill himself while making it." The Author DAN DROLLETTE described how wallabies could replace the lab rat in the Octo |
April 5, 1999, 05:36 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
I think I'll wait for the .45 version.
------------------ A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined; George Washington Jan 8,1790--There can be no doubt about the Second Amendment. |
April 5, 1999, 11:05 AM | #3 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,824
|
Is it concealable beneath a sports jacket and can it take a folding stock and bayonet?
|
April 5, 1999, 12:11 PM | #4 |
Staff Emeritus
Join Date: November 23, 1998
Location: a small forest in Texas
Posts: 7,079
|
Nuclear explosions generate such severe levels of EMF (?electromagnetic force?) that (25 years ago) the military said all radio communication and computer operations would be inoperable or even destroyed. I do not know what research has proven since then, but what effect would such EMF have on such weapons as "My next gun"?
Also, I believe I saw on (?the Discovery Channel?) a program called "InSight". LawEnforcement research into this field indicated that LE may be able to disrupt typical electrical usage, in a home (for example), to permanently destroy computers, microwaves, TVs, and even disrupt the use of common light bulbs (or destroy them). This being done with EMF generating devices. I believe they called one an "EMF cannon" or something similar. Naturally such weapons as high intensity low-cyle sound waves (causing disabling nausea), EMF "devices" and other technically advanced non-lethal law enforcement "aids" would only be used to protect American subjects... er,... citizens in hostage and "stand-off" situations. Such "tools" would never be used against large groups of men, women, elderly, children, and infants or to attack some remote mountain "stronghold". ((Sorry, that may have been a bit "off thread". The connection is "electronics".)) If the barrels must be re-loaded or sent to the factory for re-loading, there would have to be some device to quickly change barrels. I wonder if that device would be called a magazine or a clip. [This message has been edited by Dennis (edited April 05, 1999).] |
April 5, 1999, 12:11 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Hotels
Posts: 3,668
|
I saw a video of this gun in operation about 2 years ago.. that is when it first hit the mags too. It is an interesting concept, but only really practical for vehicle mounted systems, or point defense.
It would make a great alternative to the Phalanx system currently protecting our ships from incoming missles. Last I head reloading was laborious and time consuming.. the BEST method was completely removing all of the barrels and attaching new ones with rounds already in them. Their were some concerns about velocity and POI differences, since the first rounds would have significantly less barrel to travel through than the later rounds.. Looked freakin' awesome in the video though! |
April 5, 1999, 12:36 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Location: Capac, MI, USA
Posts: 1,927
|
A bit impractical as a sidearm, I think. I recently read an article on "hollow point BULLETLESS ammo" which was just as neat a concept, but might actually find it's way into your holster; The concept was to use a modified case as a hollow point bullet; Each round firing the previous round's case out the barrel. Hard on reloaders, I suppose, but it seemed to have some potential for machine guns.
|
April 5, 1999, 12:43 PM | #7 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 30, 1998
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 920
|
Vulcanic gun of 1840s did just that....didn't work well.
|
April 5, 1999, 12:46 PM | #8 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
EMF? HEMP? The bit of electronics involved should be easy to shield. (Reminds me of the Gov't spec writer who wanted to require that a new computer be proof against a nuke detonated directly overhead at an altitude of 100 feet. Someone suggested that he should see first find some very tough operators.) A more serious problem would seem to be that the barrel is the magazine. Too expensive for much range practice, plus being too big for the shoulder holster.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|