The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 2, 2009, 09:15 PM   #26
vox rationis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Posts: 1,855
I carry Ranger (RA40T) Winchester 180 grain JHP's. Not only do most gurus highly rate these (although the illusion of greatness is often greater than the reality, both in highly rated rounds and in gurus ), but they have low flash, and I find them very controllable.

I have tried shooting the full power Speer Gold Dot's in 165 grains (there was a reduced power 165 grain Gold Dot load that apparently didn't perform well), but I find that their recoil is increased enough so as to cause a degradation in my shooting ability. I could probably practice and get better with them, but I buy into the theory that at handgun velocities heavier is generally better anyway, so there is no reason to invest time in getting good with the 165'ers.

This is a list of loads that supposedly has been tested and do quite well based on FBI testing parameters as published in tacticalforums.com

.40 S&W:
Barnes XPB 140 & 155 gr JHP (copper bullet)
Speer Gold Dot 155 gr JHP
Federal Tactical 165 gr JHP (LE40T3)
Winchester Ranger-T 165 gr JHP (RA40TA)
Winchester Partition Gold 165 gr JHP (RA401P)
Federal HST 180 gr JHP (P40HST1)
Federal Tactical 180 gr JHP (LE40T1)
Remington Golden Saber 180 gr JHP (GS40SWB)
Speer Gold Dot 180 gr JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 180 gr JHP (RA40T)
Winchester 180 gr bonded JHP (Q4355)
vox rationis is offline  
Old February 2, 2009, 10:47 PM   #27
camaro_thunder92
Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 17
I carry Hornady 180gr JHP's. I did a lot of research before choosing a round, and the 180gr. do perform better in close quarters. You don't have to worry about your round potentially making it through your intended target, and into something else behind it. The heavier rounds are also slower and "hit" harder than the lighter, faster rounds. Ask the US army about the stopping power of ammo.

They used to use .45 Long colt, and decided to try out the lighter, faster .38 Long Colt (Phillipine Rebellion of 1899), but after almost losing the battle, they decided to go back to the .45 Long Colt. It all boils down to stopping power.
camaro_thunder92 is offline  
Old February 2, 2009, 11:41 PM   #28
gglass
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 638
Unfortunately, the information on the handloads.com website is dated and is based on a book that has been out for some time. The best handgun SD ammunition available today is not listed in that compilation of data. The Federal HST line of ammunition is the newest ammunition technology and is actually designed by the father of Starfire and Hydra-Shok bullets.

Follow the links on the below page to see LE department testing of HST against the current best of LE ammunition. The tests were sponsored by Federal, but the testing was conducted by LE agencies.

http://le.atk.com/general/irl/woundballistics.aspx


Yes... It always expands like this. No other ammunition can match the expansion, penetration and weight retention of HST.
__________________
"...shall not be infringed." (Must be 18. Void where prohibited. Some restrictions may apply. Not available in all states).
gglass is offline  
Old February 3, 2009, 01:39 PM   #29
Erik
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: America
Posts: 3,479
Up to date and for your information:

Currently and as of last quarter, both of the federal government's ISO 9000 labs dealing with law enforcement recommend .40 S&W 180 grain JHPs for issue to the various federal, state and local entities they service. Previously, the labs were split between 180 and 155 varieties.
__________________
Meriam Webster's: Main Entry: ci·vil·ian Pronunciation: \sə-ˈvil-yən also -ˈvi-yən\, Function: noun, Date: 14th century, 1: a specialist in Roman or modern civil law, 2 a: one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force b: outsider 1, — civilian adjective
Erik is offline  
Old February 5, 2009, 01:29 PM   #30
scorpiusdeus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2007
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 300
Quote:
federal government's ISO 9000 labs dealing with law enforcement
So go with anything BUT those...

Seriously though. Most modern HP rounds made by reputable manufacturers are going to do the job well. In any given shooting I doubt that Having shot the same bad guy in the same place the same number of times, one round is going to make THAT big a difference over another with Quality ammo.
scorpiusdeus is offline  
Old February 6, 2009, 09:47 PM   #31
LoneStarWings
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 15, 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 213
Well I picked up a box of 165gr Federal HST's today. I wanted the 180's but the store was out of those. I went through 20 rounds at the range and everything went well. The recoil feels a bit lighter than the 180gr rounds, but not much of a difference, and there were no malfunctions aside from my mediocre-at-best marksmanship.. Maybe I will test the expansion myself on some milk jugs/water next time I go to the ranch. In the meantime I will keep these HST's in my M&P's mags.
LoneStarWings is offline  
Old February 7, 2009, 09:34 AM   #32
WESHOOT2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
optimum

I use and recommend 135g JHP bullets for civilian defense ammo (except, oddly, my 40 S&W-chambered 1911 is currently loaded with my 155g Silvertip load).

Potential civilian 'best' comes with the 135--165g offerings.


I used to offer a short-barrel 1300fps 135g load, but now I don't offer anything. Except experienced advice....
__________________
.
"all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo"
WESHOOT2 is offline  
Old February 7, 2009, 09:35 AM   #33
ohioguardsman88
Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2009
Location: OH-IO (est.1803)
Posts: 69
180g

you can't go wrong with the 180g rd.
__________________
In God We Trust
ohioguardsman88 is offline  
Old February 7, 2009, 06:56 PM   #34
longeyes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2000
Location: True West
Posts: 1,350
I have Ranger 180g in my Glock 23. I like the penetration and the lower recoil. If I wanted a lighter bullet I'd shoot 9mm.
__________________
"You come far, Pilgrim."
"Feels like far."
"Were it worth the trouble?"
"Ah...what trouble?" ~Jeremiah Johnson
longeyes is offline  
Old February 7, 2009, 07:53 PM   #35
45reloader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 669
http://www.brassfetcher.com/40%20S&W.html
__________________
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government" T Jeff.
45reloader is offline  
Old February 7, 2009, 08:12 PM   #36
EricReynolds
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 393
I personally use Remington 180 and have never had a problem.
EricReynolds is offline  
Old June 15, 2009, 12:32 AM   #37
Diamond LawDawg
Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 75
Glock 27

Winchester Supreme Elite Bonded (PDX1) 165 gr jhp.........retired PO and I don't leave home without it...
Diamond LawDawg is offline  
Old June 15, 2009, 02:27 AM   #38
Nnobby45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
It's been said that there aren't any bad HP's in .40 cal.

US Border Patrol has used generic Rem. JHP's, I think 155 gr., and they've worked fine.

Golden Saber 165 grs. were my choice until DPX and HST came along. Now, I either load up with 165 HST or DPX, and in either case, carry HST or GS for backkup.

Haven't been able to get any 155 or I might carry that.

I use a similar formula when I carry .45.-- with 230 for HST and Golden Saber, and DPX 180 gr.

And of course, there are those who couldn't sleep at night without their nearby pistol being loaded up with 185 gr.s

Last edited by Nnobby45; June 15, 2009 at 02:40 AM.
Nnobby45 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06402 seconds with 8 queries