The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 23, 2024, 03:03 AM   #1
AgentPickle
Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2023
Posts: 21
Anderson Manufacturing?

I finally did a review on a poverty pony. In my opinion it is good enough as an entry level AR. Upgrade as you progress? Opinions?
Please let me know if I missed any points?
https://youtu.be/TD8DH4ziMKc?si=sb7F_AEc37n-0thQ
AgentPickle is offline  
Old April 23, 2024, 08:08 AM   #2
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,265
I've used Anderson blem stripped lowers for builds, and no issues. In AR-15 rifles, I think the lower and upper receiver matter very little as long as they're milspec. AR-10 is a whole different story.
__________________
NRA Life Member
taylorce1 is offline  
Old April 23, 2024, 02:15 PM   #3
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,239
Can’t watch the video right now, but with Anderson I find that their major components are just fine; barrels, receivers and BCGs.
I find their LPKs and triggers to be less than desirable for me.
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!!
rickyrick is offline  
Old April 24, 2024, 08:05 AM   #4
Destructo6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 18, 1999
Location: Nogales, AZ USA
Posts: 4,001
I wish every manufacturer packaged their LPK like Anderson.
__________________
God gave you a soul.
Your parents, a body.
Your country, a rifle.

Keep all of them clean.
Destructo6 is offline  
Old April 24, 2024, 09:09 AM   #5
zukiphile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylorce1
In AR-15 rifles, I think the lower and upper receiver matter very little as long as they're milspec.
I've assembled a handful of ARs, mostly with Anderson closed trigger lowers and no forward assist/no port cover uppers. The lowers don't take a full length grip screw.

The only dimensional problems I've had were when I splurged and bought more expensive billet lowers. Those lowers are also so sharp that they can be uncomfortable to carry by the magazine well. Those lowers also have screws for the bolt catch and rear pin spring, and a tension adjustment screw to make an upper and lower fit tighter.

Those additional features are of very slight value me. I prefer Andersons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RR
I find their LPKs and triggers to be less than desirable for me.
I know I've used an Anderson LPK because it came with a Stainless FCG. It was shockingly soft.

Last edited by zukiphile; April 24, 2024 at 09:50 AM.
zukiphile is offline  
Old April 25, 2024, 02:57 PM   #6
AlaskaMike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Posts: 944
I apologize, my "AR speak" is a little rusty.

What is an "LPK"?

I work in telecom, and sometimes I think the AR world has far more three letter acronyms, which is a truly amazing accomplishment.
AlaskaMike is offline  
Old April 25, 2024, 03:19 PM   #7
zukiphile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,474
Quote:
What is an "LPK"?
Apologies. Overuse of initialisms is frustrating.

Lower parts kit. The fire control group (FCG), bolt catch parts, and springs and pins, but not the receiver extension and stock.
zukiphile is offline  
Old April 26, 2024, 08:23 PM   #8
davidsog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2018
Posts: 1,330
I use Anderson stripped lowers for several builds. A forged aluminum receiver is the strongest receiver you can get for an AR and Anderson makes a great one no matter what you compare it too.
davidsog is offline  
Old April 26, 2024, 11:04 PM   #9
stagpanther
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,861
Not long ago you could by them in batches of 5 for $25 each--I have many AR builds based on them and have never had any issues with any of them. Their barrels are another matter, I've had a couple that were dogs--but I'm just lucky that way.
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill
I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk!
stagpanther is offline  
Old April 27, 2024, 07:53 AM   #10
9x19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 15, 1998
Location: Sherman, TX USA
Posts: 3,753
The only issue I've had with Anderson lowers was caused by another vendor's buffer tubes. Some tube styles will let you go one thread too far on installation, making it impossible to mate upper/lower.

Sorry, can't remember the source of the BT, but Anderson was quick and accurate with their reply when I asked them about the problem I had closing my upper on their lower.
__________________
Make mine lean, mean, and 9x19!
9x19 is online now  
Old April 27, 2024, 10:49 AM   #11
paknheat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2006
Location: East Texas
Posts: 338
Guess I’ll join the crowd here and give a big thumbs up to Anderson.

Done quite a few ARs with their uppers and lowers and never had a problem with them.

Their 6.8 SPC 16” barrels I used were an excellent buy for the price.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
paknheat is offline  
Reply

Tags
ar15


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08079 seconds with 10 queries