June 10, 2007, 04:33 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 537
|
M1A vs Fal
Which is a better battle rife, if one is better than the other and why?
__________________
Will work for brass. I apologise in advance for spelling errors. |
June 10, 2007, 06:57 PM | #2 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
M1A..
Because its American WildanergonomicallybetterformebesidesAlaska |
June 10, 2007, 07:16 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 30, 2006
Location: midwest
Posts: 1,098
|
fwiw, at an informal shoot me and another fellow challenged each other to a one shot 200yard run off. m1a kicked his fal butt. does that make it a better battle rifle? may be, maybe not. hopefull here we will never need to know!...bobn
|
June 10, 2007, 07:19 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2007
Posts: 264
|
M1A better quality. Wildalaska, if you are talking about the M1A for spring field arms. It's not even american as far as I know.
|
June 10, 2007, 08:47 PM | #5 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
Quote:
Canadian receivers, Taiwanese small parts, US barrels and stock sets. Unless you have an older one with GI parts, like moi WildandalphamakesanicerecieverAlaska |
|
June 11, 2007, 01:24 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2005
Location: South China, Maine
Posts: 814
|
For what its worth, 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment - Delta adopted the M1A platform as their official sniper rifle when they were first commissioned in 1979. Last I knew, they were still using it. The FAL, to my knowledge, has never been employed as a sniper rifle. To me, this is a clue as to which is more accurate.
__________________
Bushmaster Superlight AR-15 5.56mm / Custom 24" Heavy BBL Varmint AR-15 5.56mm / Ruger M77 .257 Roberts / Ruger MKI 22LR Pistol / EAA Witness 9mm Pistol / Daisy 2202 22LR / Remington Viper 522 22LR / Stevens 200 .223 / Savage 10FP 24" .308 / Mauser 98 Sporter 30-06 |
June 11, 2007, 09:47 AM | #7 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: OCONUS 61°13′06″N 149°53′57″W
Posts: 2,282
|
As a competition gun, the M14 and its modern day clones may have an edge. As a service rifle, which needs to combine speed of handling, reliability, and good ergonomics with minute of man kind of accuracy out to 400 or so meters . . . FAL is far superior.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
June 11, 2007, 12:35 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2005
Location: South China, Maine
Posts: 814
|
Horse, pick up "inside the delta force" by Eric Haney. The M14 was the originally adopted sniper rifle, NOT the M21.
It was also the weapon being used through the Somalia incident. You can figure that one out by watching black hawk down. Thanks. (the M1a is the updated Civilian version of the M14, for those who do not know) EDIT: after posting this, I went down to my mailbox and grabbed my copy of "The Ultimate Sniper - An advanced training manual for military and police snipers" which just arrived today. I opened the package and looked the book over. Low and behold, back cover, lower right corner... whats this? a picture of a US military sniper with... an M14? You betcha!
__________________
Bushmaster Superlight AR-15 5.56mm / Custom 24" Heavy BBL Varmint AR-15 5.56mm / Ruger M77 .257 Roberts / Ruger MKI 22LR Pistol / EAA Witness 9mm Pistol / Daisy 2202 22LR / Remington Viper 522 22LR / Stevens 200 .223 / Savage 10FP 24" .308 / Mauser 98 Sporter 30-06 |
June 11, 2007, 01:09 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,902
|
For a 7.62 infantry rifle, probably the FAL. For a squad designated marksman or some long range accuracy dependent "force multiplier" role, the M14.
(Just MHO, I reserve the right to be wrong! ) Jason |
June 11, 2007, 01:15 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 23, 2005
Location: Castorland, NY
Posts: 545
|
Chris,
That might be what the book says, however the Sniper configuration of the M-14 is the M-21 and a limited number of M-25's(?). Visualy they appair the same, but the M-21 is best compared to a National Match M-1A/14, not a rack grade M-14. The M-21 was the standard Army Sniper Rifle from the 60's until the M-24 Sniper Weapon System (Remington 700) was adopted in the mid-late 80's. The M-24 may be on the way out in the next two- three years if the Knight M-110 Semi-Auto Sniper System ever gets into the field. Some units retained the M-21 for special purposes after the M-24 came on line. Firing from a moving Helo, ala Blackhawk Down would be a good example of special purposes. Today a lot of "rack grade" M-14's are being pushed into service as "Designated Marksman Rifles". They are often erroniously refered to as "sniper" rifles, but are far from it. A few have also been converted by Smith Enterprises, illegaly per procurement standards. These so called "Crazy Horse" rifles may classify has sniper rifles under loose terms. Snipers and Designated Marksmen serve very differant roles. DSA did submit a FAL Sniper Rifle to the XM-110 Trails, but it was not selected. Not sharing a manual of arms with the M-16 family and a overly complicated stock probably had something to do with that. Has a battle rifle the FAL has a lot going for it and is probably the most widely used Battle Rifle in the world. Beat up versions are still around fighting wars all over the world. My own rifle is about 50 years old and still going. The M-14 never realy caught on any where but here.
__________________
Pro Patria "For Country" www.pro-patria.us (Material x Training)/Tactics = Mission Success Last edited by Desert01; June 11, 2007 at 02:44 PM. Reason: Added commentsJason thanks for the Crazy horse Correction, I most have had those Springer White Feathers on my mind! |
June 11, 2007, 01:47 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,902
|
Quote:
Jason |
|
June 11, 2007, 02:51 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 26, 2001
Posts: 577
|
You got a bunch of replies that the better SNIPER rifle is the M1A but since you asked about the better BATTLE rifle, go with the FAL.
The M1A/M14 is handsome, powerful, and American but it was also one of the biggest duds as a military rifle. |
June 11, 2007, 02:54 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 23, 2005
Location: Castorland, NY
Posts: 545
|
When you go beyound a Battle Rifle:
DSA FAL: http://www.dsarms.com/prodinfo.asp?number=SA58SPR Springfield M-25: http://www.springfield-armory.com/armory.php?model=17 Springfield M-21: http://www.springfield-armory.com/armory.php?model=20 Crazy Horse: http://www.smithenterprise.com/products02.html
__________________
Pro Patria "For Country" www.pro-patria.us (Material x Training)/Tactics = Mission Success |
June 11, 2007, 03:01 PM | #14 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
Quote:
WildcanyousaathatforafalinafirstworldcountryAlaska |
|
June 11, 2007, 04:14 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,902
|
Desert01,
I believe the picture you show for the Crazy Horse is actually the MK14SEI, not the Crazy Horse. I think the designation for the Crazy Horse is the M14SE, and is the one being held by the soldier in the first pic on this page: http://www.smithenterprise.com/products02a.html Jason |
June 11, 2007, 05:31 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Posts: 61
|
The FAL in the 1975-76 Lebanese War
During the 1975-76 war in Lebanon, the Palestinian Militias were armed by Syria mostly with AK 47 assault rifles with the intention to take over the country and force the Christian population to take refuge in Canada and Australia. As the lebanese army desintegrated, christians managed to take over many of the army's depots including a few thousands FAL 7.62. and later bought or received as a gift a generous lot of M16s from Israel. At the time I was in Lebanon and close to the Christian Lebanese Forces Militia. I observed that the AK47 was no match to the FAL in accuracy or range. Its advantage (the AK47) is the simplicity of its mecanism and maintainance. The 30 round curved magazines seem an advantage compared to the 20 rounds of the FAL, but the straight magazine of the FAL with little practice, can be rested on the knee of the sitting shooter and accuracy is considerably boosted. With the FAL and the M16 the christian militias kept the palestinians at bay and won momorable battles, in the cities and in the mountains. As to the MK14 I don't have firsthand information to comment.
|
June 11, 2007, 08:09 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 23, 2005
Location: Castorland, NY
Posts: 545
|
Jason,
Yeah the Smith Rifles are getting hard to sort out at this point. Of note is the Leupold VX-III 1.5-5X20 in the picture you refer to. Definately more of a DM sight then a sniper sight.
__________________
Pro Patria "For Country" www.pro-patria.us (Material x Training)/Tactics = Mission Success |
June 11, 2007, 09:19 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: June 11, 2007
Posts: 43
|
both are good choices but neither are on my list for 7.62mm "sniper rifles"
|
June 11, 2007, 10:41 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
"...the M1A is the updated Civilian version of the M14..." It's a commercial copy, not an updated M-14. Nor is it a battle rifle. Neither are any of the other commercially made copies of the M14 or FAL.
"...Thats why they are still being issued..." Not as they were first issued in the mid 50's. Nor are they issued to regular infantry. It lasted as an MBR for the least number of years of ANY U.S. rifle. A real FAL is a proven battle rifle. In jungle, deserts, the Arctic and every other lovely climate. The M-14 proved to be a dismal failure in the jungle. Mind you, in jungles, so did the early M-16's. |
June 11, 2007, 11:16 PM | #20 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2005
Location: South China, Maine
Posts: 814
|
Quote:
Quote:
Of course, this could just be another one of those military trial (and eventually dismissal) phases, much like the 6.5 Grendel. That is an amazing cartridge, and was being tested among a few different specops units, but it seems to have died out. Too bad.
__________________
Bushmaster Superlight AR-15 5.56mm / Custom 24" Heavy BBL Varmint AR-15 5.56mm / Ruger M77 .257 Roberts / Ruger MKI 22LR Pistol / EAA Witness 9mm Pistol / Daisy 2202 22LR / Remington Viper 522 22LR / Stevens 200 .223 / Savage 10FP 24" .308 / Mauser 98 Sporter 30-06 |
||
June 12, 2007, 10:48 AM | #21 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: OCONUS 61°13′06″N 149°53′57″W
Posts: 2,282
|
Quote:
Quote:
416 does run better with a suppressor, and does run easier at very short barrel lengths, which might explain why it's populat with the current users. Quote:
|
|||
June 12, 2007, 01:36 PM | #22 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2005
Location: South China, Maine
Posts: 814
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The Grendel was under consideration by the military the same time as the SPC. what they found was the SPC offered no ballistic advantage over the 5.56mm cartridge, but the Grendel offered nearly identical ballistics to the 308 round out to 800 yards, with just slightly more recoil than the 5.56mm. I have not heard any updates since that report, but there is still muffled talk on the military sniper forums about 6.5 Grendel chambered rifles still in use.
__________________
Bushmaster Superlight AR-15 5.56mm / Custom 24" Heavy BBL Varmint AR-15 5.56mm / Ruger M77 .257 Roberts / Ruger MKI 22LR Pistol / EAA Witness 9mm Pistol / Daisy 2202 22LR / Remington Viper 522 22LR / Stevens 200 .223 / Savage 10FP 24" .308 / Mauser 98 Sporter 30-06 |
|||
June 12, 2007, 02:49 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 23, 2005
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 1,324
|
Why all the talk about "sniper rifles" which neither the M14 nor the FAL are? As for battle rifles, the FAL is superior in my opinion.
|
June 12, 2007, 02:52 PM | #25 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: OCONUS 61°13′06″N 149°53′57″W
Posts: 2,282
|
Quote:
Quote:
SOCOM did not trial Grendel at all, to the best of my knowledge, nor did it ever have any official backing or interest. The Tier One guys may have (and may be using it), but so far as I know, no one in White Side SOF units is using Grendel or has used Grendel. Alexander Arms may claim otherwise to sell more stuff, but I've seen no evidence to back up the internet buzz about SOF types using Grendel. 6.8mm Rem SPC barely got its foot, briefly, in the door, and Grendel would seem to still be out in the cold entirely (again, unless CAG is using it). For dedicated sniping there are much better rounds, and for a basic service carbine it's ballistics at 600+ meters are pretty much irrelevant. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|