November 6, 2002, 09:33 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: September 19, 2002
Location: Northeast Tennessee
Posts: 20
|
Draft
If the War with Iraq ever comes to be, do you think there will be a draft?? My initial thought is "No" since we didnt need one in Desert Storm. Your thoughts.......
|
November 6, 2002, 09:38 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 4,303
|
No. It would not require the large numbers of people that participated in WWI, WWII and Korea and would not last as long as Vietnam where thousands of troops were shipped in for one year intervals. There would not be enough time to set up a draft program, draft, equip, train and deploy the draftees.
__________________
NRA Certified Instructor: Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Home Safety, Personal Protection, Range Safety Officer NRA Life Member |
November 7, 2002, 01:09 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 14, 2001
Posts: 1,771
|
No, I think they'll be able to handle all the surrendering Iraqis just as well as they did before.
|
November 7, 2002, 01:15 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 1999
Location: Nogales, AZ USA
Posts: 4,000
|
No. If they need more, they'll call up active reserves, then inactive reserves.
I know I wouldn't want a conscript with me in a fighting hole.
__________________
God gave you a soul. Your parents, a body. Your country, a rifle. Keep all of them clean. |
November 7, 2002, 05:53 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 8, 2000
Location: Illinois
Posts: 479
|
This will probably be a small affair with Marines and elements of the 1st Cav, 101st Airborne, some armor, and mechanized infantry. I don't think they have any plans to do a mobilization as large as they did during Desert Shield. Hell, most of the toys they need are still over there in storage from the last time we kicked Iraq's ass.
|
November 7, 2002, 07:08 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: October 16, 2002
Location: Left coast.
Posts: 27
|
Draft.
No, not against Iraq. However, if we ever go at it with the Chinese...
If there is a draft I would like to see the ages expanded as I am a father with sons. The birthrate has been so low in recent decades that the percentage of the population of draftable age is much lower than it used to be. Also, why not make more men elligible for the draft -- you might see less support for wars? Also, I'd like to see Clinton given the opportunity to be able to serve in the U.S. Army as he made himself scarce during Vietnam. And one last thing, it was the baby-boomers who didn't have many kids, why force the ones who did to shoulder the burden of protecting their fat -----? |
November 7, 2002, 08:26 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 14, 2000
Posts: 1,143
|
No. There is never a "need" for a draft. If a society's members will not voluntarily defend it, then it isn't worth defending.
Conscription = Slavery
__________________
"No honest man needs a handgun smaller than a canned ham." Bill Ruger |
November 7, 2002, 08:55 AM | #8 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 11, 2000
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 16,002
|
Nope.
|
November 7, 2002, 10:40 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2001
Location: Kentucky, Refugee from California
Posts: 1,097
|
I think No unless things go really bad. You can never tell with war. Things happen that you can't project.
I registered for the draft in 1973 and fully expected to get sent to Viet Nam. I was put into the lottery system and got 86. If the war had continued as it had, I was sure to go. However, Nixon stopped the draft that same year. I lucked out timing wise. My Dad did the same in WWII. He was 29 when WWII started and was a Chemical Engineer. He worked on the chemical side of the Manhatten Project and was considered more valuable to the war effort here than overseas. I would have gone if called, but at that time, the Vietnam war was incredibly unpopular. My older brother (12 years older) went. He said it really sucked there. Very hot, and bugs everywhere. He told me not to volunteer to go there even if I could because it was such a rat-hole. |
November 7, 2002, 10:41 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 1999
Location: Wyo-Tana
Posts: 1,298
|
Never say never. (Unless used in Churchill's context.) Might not need a draft for war in Iraq, might need it for war elsewhere.
__________________
Remember, many times what we view as a curse in the present turns out to be a blessing in the future. Don't worry about it a lot. Things have a way of working out. Trust me on this one. - - Uncle Bill Martino |
November 7, 2002, 11:13 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: College Station, Texas
Posts: 1,871
|
No, I think I'll have mine in the bottle. They taste better that way.
__________________
COME AND TAKE IT!!! |
November 7, 2002, 11:53 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,004
|
"I was put into the lottery system and got 86. If the war had continued as it had, I was sure to go."
Yup. IIRC, the year before they went up to 125. Now, if they require women to register for the draft (uh-huh, been waiting for more than 30 years for the libbers to make that happen), the size of the pool would double and only half as many guys would be tapped for the honor. John |
November 7, 2002, 12:05 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 16, 2001
Location: East Boston, MA
Posts: 1,184
|
Quote:
Most of the anti-women-in-the-military arguments that I hear come from guys.
__________________
Well behaved women rarely make history WyldOne's Fun & Political BB WyldOne's homepage |
|
November 7, 2002, 12:21 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 9, 2001
Posts: 1,977
|
In The Patriot, people get a "that's just not right" attitude in the scene where Tavington tells the black free men that they can have "the privilege of serving in the King's army". But yet many people are for the conscription of our own sons, cousins, friends, etc.? And now apparently, since men will be conscripted, women want to be conscripted too? Imagine if my wife gets conscripted and has to fight in some foreign county and I don't get conscripted...
__________________
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara desert in five years there’d be a shortage of sand. -Milton Friedman |
November 7, 2002, 01:57 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 1999
Location: Knoxville, in the Free State of Tennesse
Posts: 4,190
|
No.
|
November 7, 2002, 02:09 PM | #16 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 16, 2001
Location: East Boston, MA
Posts: 1,184
|
I never saw the movie The Patriot, so I can't comment on that.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Well behaved women rarely make history WyldOne's Fun & Political BB WyldOne's homepage |
||
November 7, 2002, 02:17 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 9, 2001
Posts: 1,977
|
WyldOne- What you are essentially saying is that if men are being served an injustice like conscription that women should be served that injustice as well. You would change the law so that everybody is screwed...but screwed equally? This is ridiculous. Also, conscription has nothing to do with being a patriot.
Quote:
__________________
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara desert in five years there’d be a shortage of sand. -Milton Friedman |
|
November 7, 2002, 02:22 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 16, 2001
Location: East Boston, MA
Posts: 1,184
|
Please understand. I am not in favor of the draft. Heck, I have major issues with the military in general.
BUT. If there is going to be a draft, it should include everyone who is physically capable of fighting. (I'm not sure of what kind of limitations there are on draftees--my understanding is, that it is every male who is physically capable.)
__________________
Well behaved women rarely make history WyldOne's Fun & Political BB WyldOne's homepage |
November 7, 2002, 02:25 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 9, 2001
Posts: 1,977
|
If you're not in favor of the draft why the heck would you want it expanded?
__________________
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara desert in five years there’d be a shortage of sand. -Milton Friedman |
November 7, 2002, 02:28 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2001
Location: Moved to Deepest Dixie
Posts: 789
|
There's no way a draft will be called any time soon. Americans want clean, high-tech wars they can watch on TV. They want the "cheap" oil. (Not counting the billions of tax dollars spent on the military.) They want to tie plastic American flags to the aerials of their SUVs and shoot at Osama targets and put "United we Stand" bumper stickers on their pickups.
They do NOT want to take time off work (bad career move), or Johnny (or Janey) coming home in a box. The politically ambitious can always enlist.
__________________
"Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded because it compromises and develops the germ of every other. As the parent of armies, war encourages debts and taxes, the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. In war, too, the discretionary power of the executive is extended ... and all the means of seducing the minds, are added to those of subduing the force, of the people ..." - James Madison (quote by Gore Vidal) |
November 7, 2002, 02:30 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 16, 2001
Location: East Boston, MA
Posts: 1,184
|
I'm not saying, "Let's expand the draft!!!!!"
But. IF there is to be a draft, it should include men and women. THAT is equality. Edited/changed for clarification. (I hope )
__________________
Well behaved women rarely make history WyldOne's Fun & Political BB WyldOne's homepage |
November 7, 2002, 02:55 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,764
|
Malone,
Do you really believe all that?! If so, might I suggest you escape CA and experience actual America where the reast of us live? I think it might do you a world of good.
__________________
Doing what you've done, gets you what you've got. |
November 7, 2002, 03:51 PM | #23 |
Staff Alumnus
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 7,022
|
We already had this discussion a year ago and it proved more divisive than any other topic we've seen on TFL. I recommend searching the archives first.
|
November 7, 2002, 03:51 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 29, 2000
Location: Portsmouth, NH, USA
Posts: 905
|
WyldOne,
I think that what Ronin is saying is that just because 50% of the population is getting the shaft, we don't improve the situation by giving 100% the shaft. Soviet Communism did the same thing by making everyone poor as opposed to a fraction of the population. In situations like these equality is not a good thing. Our end goal, hopefully, would be to make it so that there is as little injustice and oppression as possible. When we expand the draft we are also expanding the amount of injustice being perpetuated. Sacrificing justice on an altar of equality is not a good thing.
__________________
"It does not take a majority to prevail...but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." -Samuel Adams "Give me ten Jesuits and I shall conquer the world" -Stalin |
November 7, 2002, 04:21 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2001
Location: Moved to Deepest Dixie
Posts: 789
|
ahenry,
I'm talking about the REST of America, of course.
__________________
"Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded because it compromises and develops the germ of every other. As the parent of armies, war encourages debts and taxes, the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. In war, too, the discretionary power of the executive is extended ... and all the means of seducing the minds, are added to those of subduing the force, of the people ..." - James Madison (quote by Gore Vidal) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|