January 22, 2002, 10:17 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 15, 2001
Location: Over here.
Posts: 246
|
Most overrated?
This is hopefully a new idea- to get away from the "What's your
favorite -----" polls, and the like. What is, in your opinion, the MOST OVERRATED handgun currently available, and why? ANM |
January 22, 2002, 10:31 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2000
Location: Wa
Posts: 922
|
I guess I would have to say the Glock. I have nothing against the Austrian pistol it is defiantly a very good auto, except i like some metal and a hammer on my pistols. There are many brands and model's as good or better, but they are not put into a god like statis. JMHO.
Tony
__________________
Nothing Ventured Nothing Gained Last edited by tonyz; January 22, 2002 at 10:52 AM. |
January 22, 2002, 10:39 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2001
Location: Manila, Phil.
Posts: 1,004
|
Quote:
You're welcome, New_comer |
|
January 22, 2002, 10:41 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2002
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 562
|
Australian? Try Austrian....
I also, regretfully will say Glock. Being of Austrian descent you think I should love it. Besides looks, or lack of, the grip angle is so different compared to other guns. Makes it difficult to shoot various other fine weapons. Steve Mc. |
January 22, 2002, 10:47 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2001
Location: Manila, Phil.
Posts: 1,004
|
Oh, I forgot my reply...
IMHO, all pistols that are more expensive than my USP9f are scandalously priced and definitely overrated. Since i'm still saving up for a p7, this would be my honest stand on the matter, for now... Be safe, New_comer |
January 22, 2002, 10:52 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2000
Posts: 2,456
|
IMHO the most overrated pistols are those custom-built 1911s that cost $4,000 and up. You can spend under a grand on a Kimber or such and get a perfectly good 1911. That last one hundredth of a ninute of angle costs too much.
__________________
"As I looked at my two young sons, each with his gun, and considered how much the safety of the party depended on these little fellows, I felt grateful to you, dear husband, for having acquainted them in childhood with the use of firearms." -- Elisabeth Robinson, in The Swiss Family Robinson by Johann Wyss |
January 22, 2002, 11:25 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 6, 2001
Location: California
Posts: 3,020
|
Custom 1911's. Why? I just haven't found enough value in them to justify the difference between them and my USP Expert 45.
|
January 22, 2002, 11:48 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: January 20, 2000
Posts: 66
|
HK P7
|
January 22, 2002, 11:56 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2000
Location: Ephrata, wa. USA
Posts: 1,338
|
Well, the winner in this category is once again....the Glock. When it came out in the eighties it was unique. Think about it. If it came out in 2001 would it have been so successful? No way.
I must give Gaston Glock credit....his timing was pretty darn good but there's really nothing special about his pistol. He's sittin' on a beach somewhere, sippin' a umbrella drink laughin' his a** off |
January 22, 2002, 12:27 PM | #10 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 11, 2000
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 16,002
|
HK USP.
Your guns aren't selling at $489? Mark 'em up to $689 and watch folks line up for the quality and exclusivity afforded by the new, higher price tag.
(For those of you not old enough to remember or who weren't in the hobby at the time, the USP was introduced as HK's "low-end Glock competitor". They really didn't sell all that well originally; jacking up the price actually helped sales take off.) |
January 22, 2002, 12:43 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 27, 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 265
|
1) 1911 - I do not even have to explain.
2) HK-94 - Cheap stamped receiver, and after you spend $3500, you still have a 9mm. 3) Mark 23 - Just another .45 with a longer barrel. Get a Tactical instead, save $1000. |
January 22, 2002, 01:07 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 1999
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 2,543
|
Just my humble opinion . . .
Not trying to join a war, or anything, but I really feel the 1911s are overrated. I like them (flat, can have great triggers, just plain fun to shoot), but I can't say I have ever found one (regardless of the amount of custom work) that's as reliable as a Glock or a Mk III Hi-Power or any H&K or Sig I've ever fired.
And I've fired a pretty good number of 1911s - virtually all with custom work done by reputable 'smiths. Yes, I know that a lot of competition is done with 1911s - that shows that if you tune a machine to work with a specific load (or, rather, tune the load to work with a specific machine), you can make it work well. Now show me you can run even 100 rounds of various JHP loads through that machine w/o failure. Or is that asking too much? I don't think it is, but that's just my opinion. Now, I certainly agree that the Glocks aren't the as supermagical as sometimes touted. (Heck, what is?) But since we're talking about which type of pistol has more of a bigger following than I feel it's earned, I think the 1911 outdoes the Glock. |
January 22, 2002, 01:16 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: January 13, 2002
Location: Silicon Valley, PRK
Posts: 80
|
* 1911
|
January 22, 2002, 01:17 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 93
|
I think I'll have to go with the USP as well. Just too expensive for no good reason. My brother really wanted one, but I think he's changed his mind after renting one.
Rick |
January 22, 2002, 01:19 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 1999
Posts: 2,144
|
The most overrated guns are whichever ones a given poster owns at a given time.
Just to throw gasoline on the fire I'd have to say Les Baer. |
January 22, 2002, 01:21 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 11, 1999
Posts: 2,501
|
Glock (but excellent marketing)
|
January 22, 2002, 01:48 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 15, 2001
Location: Over here.
Posts: 246
|
Pretty good reasoning, guys. I pretty much concur with all of the
choices put down so far. I also like how this hasn't been turned into a name-calling event because someone's favorite gun was picked (and no-one used the word "SUCKS" ). Anyway, so far it seems that the custom 1911 types are regarded as overrated with a vote of 6, the Glock following close with 4, and the USP-types with a count of 3 (or tied with the Glock, depending on how you read New Comer's post ). (I was a little surprised with the Glock's # of votes, but hey, that's cool. ). So, post on! FTR, I think that the 1911-types are overrated, too. Nothing wrong with them (I like them, too, but I don't make a religion out of them), or with the Glock (added as a disclaimer ) ANM |
January 22, 2002, 01:51 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 15, 2001
Location: Over here.
Posts: 246
|
Forgot to mention something:
For RenegadeX- is the HK94 the pre-ban civilian copy of the MP5? Just wondering.... ANM |
January 22, 2002, 01:54 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 797
|
The STI (1911) Grandmaster... Absolutely!
My Kimber does every bit as well for $3000 less.
__________________
NRA Lifer Last edited by Rickmeister; January 23, 2002 at 10:42 AM. |
January 22, 2002, 02:12 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 1999
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,004
|
When you say overrated, what do you mean? Overrated by whom? The manufacturer? Shooters? Gun rags?
Glocks are well liked, and certainly have a strong following, but they do what they are advertised to do. If a gun is well liked by many does that mean it is overrated? 1911s certianly have a follwing that may rival Glock's. Why would they qualify as overrated? Price=overrated? H&Ks do everything H&K says they will do. I see them being mentioned as being overrated, but why are they overrated? Has someone proclaimed H&Ks to be the "end-all" of handguns? In my opinion, "overrated" implies that a gun is purported to do something that it can't do. In which of these cases (Glock, 1911, H&K) is that true? Shake
__________________
“The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make some other bastard die for his.” -George Patton |
January 22, 2002, 02:15 PM | #21 |
Member in memoriam
Join Date: August 13, 1999
Location: In The HOT, Humid, and Mu
Posts: 6,116
|
My vote would have to go to Sig's rival in price,
the H&K USP. Besides being big, massive, and looking more like a brick; the quality just is not the same. Best Wishes, Ala Dan, Life Member N.R.A. |
January 22, 2002, 02:17 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 8, 2001
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 938
|
SIG. Not the most expensive gun i own, but devinatly the least performance-per-dollor. For $800 it shot patterns instead of groups and the finish was peeling after 150 rounds. The trigger pull was fair to good, but the really long reset stroke made double taps an excersise in frustration. I had this gun in my poseetion for ONE DAY before it had to go back to the factory.
It realy made me glad I owned some lesser quality, "POS" guns like my Charles Daly and Glock to shoot while my world class, top-knotch infalable SIG was in for repair |
January 22, 2002, 02:21 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 206
|
1911 and Les Baer...definitely-
Semper Fi- JJC |
January 22, 2002, 02:27 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 20, 2001
Posts: 308
|
S&W autos
|
January 22, 2002, 02:29 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,757
|
Glock... without a doubt...
__________________
Hemi. gun and car collector. Rare cars, and rarer guns. |
|
|