The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 2, 2023, 04:49 PM   #1
Guru 270
Junior Member
 
Join Date: August 1, 2023
Posts: 3
270win 120grsst

Looking for help to load 120gr sst to 2700 fps for a reduced recoil load.
Guru 270 is offline  
Old August 2, 2023, 05:43 PM   #2
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,121
CAUTION: The following post (or a page linked to) includes or discusses loading data not covered by currently published sources of tested data for this cartridge (QuickLOAD or Gordon's Reloading Tool data is not professionally tested). USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. Neither the writer, The Firing Line, nor the staff of TFL assumes any liability for any damage or injury resulting from the use of this information.


Welcome to the forum.

My Hornady book (#10—I haven't purchased #11 yet) doesn't list the 120-grain SST, but it's got the 130 and a couple of 110-grain bullets, and squinting between the lines (right between a 2600 fps load for a 130 and a 2800 fps load for a 110), it looks like 41.8 grains of IMR4064 would be about where you want to go. I put the warning in the post because this isn't published data that I have my hands on, but these are both starting loads for their respective bullets that I am interpolating, so there should be no pressure issue. Use a chronograph to check what velocity you actually get. Note that the 4064 is very low on case fill with this load, so having the powder back over the primer will give higher velocities.

That said, the pressure is low with that little powder, so a faster one like IMR 4198 is likely to burn cleaner. Around 39 grains for a start with that.

Also, note that if you call Hornady and ask for load data, they will probably just give it to you.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old August 3, 2023, 07:21 AM   #3
Shadow9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 4,043
What powders do you have?
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload.
Shadow9mm is offline  
Old August 3, 2023, 12:55 PM   #4
Guru 270
Junior Member
 
Join Date: August 1, 2023
Posts: 3
Thanks uncle nick glad to be here! Can I do the same with h4350. Take start load 130gr at 2800 then take the 110load at 2600 figure where middle ground between the two loads would be. 4064,h4350,w760 available at bass pro
Guru 270 is offline  
Old August 3, 2023, 05:20 PM   #5
old roper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2007
Posts: 2,157
MIGHT TRY HERE.

https://forum.accurateshooter.com/th...-data.4086864/
__________________
Semper Fi
Vietnam 1965
VFW Life member
NRA Life Member
old roper is offline  
Old August 3, 2023, 07:26 PM   #6
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,121
Based on Hornady's data, H4350 would run about 48.6 grains. The heavier charge will add to recoil and the slower burn rate powder will reach velocity at a lower peak pressure that won't burn it as cleanly and consistently as a lighter charge of a faster powder that reached the same velocity.

VV N135 looks promising to me as a good burn rate compromise with better bulk for the big case, but it's not available everywhere.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old August 3, 2023, 09:39 PM   #7
sako2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2009
Posts: 744
Looking hodgdon data with a barnes 120gn bullet it looks like h414 or w760 would work.
sako2 is offline  
Old August 4, 2023, 12:15 PM   #8
stagpanther
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,976
Rather unusual pursuit--a soft-shooting 270 win. Following with interest.
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill
I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk!
stagpanther is offline  
Old August 4, 2023, 04:50 PM   #9
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,121
Keep in mind the 120-grain Barnes bullet in the Hodgdon data is for the obsolete FXB type, which was a smooth surface copper solid. They achieved higher start pressures with less powder than an SST would do. H414 and 760 are both canister-grade WC760, one of the military powders made in the St. Marks, Florida plant. They are slower than H380, which is slower than IMR 4064. I think, because of potential ignition issues, IMR 4064 or faster is going to play more nicely in this reduced velocity exercise with the SST.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old August 4, 2023, 05:09 PM   #10
Guru 270
Junior Member
 
Join Date: August 1, 2023
Posts: 3
What about 3031 found local
Guru 270 is offline  
Old August 4, 2023, 05:14 PM   #11
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,121
Should be a good choice.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07269 seconds with 7 queries