The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 29, 2017, 10:38 AM   #1
.284
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2009
Location: davison, michigan
Posts: 665
500 S&W primer and crimp test

I have been messing around with this stubborn TC Encore rifle for about year and a half. The latest, having to triple ring the scope and do the site in all over again. I have a load I used last year that I decided to experiment with. The load is this:

Barnes 325gr XPB
Stagline Nickle 1.615" trim
45grs W296
CCI 200 primer

The experiment was this, I went back to Hornady brass it was short 1.610", same powder as well as charge, and the Barnes bullet on top. I loaded 15 with Federal LRMP and 15 with the CCI's. Then I took 5 of one group and applied a lite crimp, 5 medium, and 5 heavy. I repeated the same with 15 others with the opposing primer. That's right 6 glorious five shot groups to test. In short, I was pitting primer against primer and the effects of crimp on group size and chronograph numbers.

Here are the targets and they are left to right 2 through 7:
Federal lite, med, heavy and CCI lite, med, heavy.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg downsized_1029171044.jpg (26.5 KB, 34 views)
File Type: jpg downsized_1029171040.jpg (21.6 KB, 28 views)
File Type: jpg downsized_1029171040a.jpg (22.2 KB, 31 views)
.284 is offline  
Old October 29, 2017, 11:07 AM   #2
.284
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2009
Location: davison, michigan
Posts: 665
Oh, I just thought of some additional information to share. I shot in this order: 2,5,3,6,4,7. Bench rest tested at 100 yards. The best chronograph numbers (SD-7) was target number 4....a terrible group. Target 3 had a SD of 22 which was 2nd best on the chronny. The average velocity of #3 was 2099 ft/sec.
.284 is offline  
Old October 30, 2017, 06:48 AM   #3
griz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 31, 2000
Location: Middle Peninsula, VA
Posts: 1,588
Were there any sight setting changes? Just seems strange the elevation would change so much with one primer but not the other.
griz is offline  
Old October 30, 2017, 08:09 AM   #4
.284
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2009
Location: davison, michigan
Posts: 665
Good observation. I did adjust the scope after I shot targets 2,5,and 3. I normally wouldn't do that but if I hadn't most likely target 4 and 7 wouldn't have hit the card board. So again, to be clear, I shot 2,5, and then 3 before I made one scope adjustment and then shot 6, 4, and then 7.

What I am wondering most is where I go from here? I like target 3 for group, but I wonder if I can tighten it up a bit? I will be using the gun for deer up in the farm lands of Michigan's thumb. I am trying to make a 250 to 300 yard gun.

Do I give Winchester primers a shot? Do I back down the amount of powder by a half to one grain? I am near max now which is 45.3 grains. Did the short cases have an effect?

Please sound off.
.284 is offline  
Old November 2, 2017, 12:12 PM   #5
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,110
Just eyeballing, I can't say I'm at all sure the differences in group sizes aren't within normal random variation. I suggest a more careful run through steps to look for an accuracy node with the rifle? Dan Newberry's OCW method is usually pretty good, I find. You'd be working in charge increments of about .3 grains to look for such nodes with his method.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old November 2, 2017, 08:31 PM   #6
.284
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2009
Location: davison, michigan
Posts: 665
I did think about the OCW method. Wasn't that also known as the Chocolate ice cream load or something? I know the powder isn't compressed or even full in the case for that matter but I'm a long way over 85%. I really don't want to go max so, I have no choice but to back down. However, I really don't want to loose a significant amount of velocity. I did notice the pressure change with the cases .005 shorter. I have a friend who is retired law enforcement and long time competition pistol shooter. He said I could back down the powder a bit and use Winchester primer to pick up 50 to 70 ft/sec.
.284 is offline  
Old November 4, 2017, 01:18 PM   #7
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,110
Primers that change velocity do so by changing peak pressure. It can be another way to tune to some degree, as higher peak pressure, even when you back the load down to matching velocity, will shorten barrel time a bit. Be aware they don't always change velocity and pressure as predicted, though. Trying is all you can do.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03753 seconds with 10 queries