|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 4, 2007, 04:39 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 23, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 719
|
My day with my Chronograph.
I've had my Competition Electronics, ProChrono for a cupple of years, mostly using it for reloads & archery related excercises but today I decided to see what my Stone Mountain Arms repro. 1851 Navy .44 would be capable of doing, sortof a test of how powerful these loads were for the persons using such weapons during the Cap & Ball era.
My findings were quite interesting. 28gr. FFFg & then Pyrodex P 142gr. .454 swaged ball CCI #11 percussion caps Now mind you this is stuff I've had in my inventory for going on 12-14 years. Standing 5 feet from the chronograph. Velocity: 845 FPS average Muzzle energy: 221.8 Ft. Lbs. WOW, that is a little better than an orriginal 158gr. LRN load from a .38 special!! How about this! 24gr. Pyrodex P 200gr. .452 semi wad cutter CCI #11 percussion caps Velocity: 739 FPS average Muzzle energy: 242.5 Ft.Lbs. That's a pretty decent thump from a weapon & caliber that was obsolete more than 100 years ago... What do any of you think? |
August 4, 2007, 04:50 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 29, 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,391
|
I wonder how much of a diff it would make if you were using goex
|
August 4, 2007, 06:45 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: August 1, 2007
Location: Mid-West
Posts: 16
|
Those results are real close to the Lyman test that were done for the, 'Lyman Black Powder Handbook' where they used 28 grains of 3fg and
4fg, G&O & C&H black powder along with a .451 RB, and .450 bullet (450229)... Contrary to what many may think in todays world of magnum loads, those using the old cap & ball revolvers were not under gunned by any means. Add these ballistic tests you did into the equation that they were also (just as today) able to load a fresh cylinder (the equivalent to a fresh magazine for them back in the C&B days) and those who relied on the reliability of the C&B Revolvers and knew how to use them were quite a force to be reckon'd with. Thanks for the test info!
__________________
Joe Martin NRA, NMLRA |
August 4, 2007, 11:13 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 23, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 719
|
Ya know if I was in the hey day of either before or slightly after the Civil War, I deffinitly wouldn't feel under gunned with one of these fine weapons next to me.
I would imagine that a Dragoon being capable of handling a charge of 40 grains safely would produce approximatly 920 FPS - 263 Ft. Lbs. or more using just a Ball & the Walker being capable of loading 55 grains would approach .357 magnum velocities!!!! |
August 5, 2007, 12:35 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 7, 2006
Posts: 225
|
The more things change, the more they stay the same, is what I was thinking when I first shot my 47 Walker.
|
|
|