The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 26, 2024, 06:09 AM   #1
NHSHOOTER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2012
Location: Concord NH
Posts: 1,002
smith and wesson

Back in the 80's I had a smith and wesson 9mm single stack I think 8 rds magazine with adjustable sights, very accurate piece, had to sell it. I dont remember the model but I would really like another 1, the one thing I do remember was that it wouldnt fire without the Magazine in it..Just looking for the model number so I can search for another 1. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated..
NHSHOOTER is offline  
Old January 26, 2024, 07:25 AM   #2
105kw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 30, 2017
Location: Columbia Basin Washington
Posts: 421
It might be 3900 series pistol. The last digit, was the frame alloy. 3904, 3905, 3906.
They came both fixed sighted, or adjustable.
Before this were the 3 digit models, 439, 539, 639. With the same sight options.
Both are good single stack Semi-autos.

Last edited by 105kw; January 26, 2024 at 04:51 PM.
105kw is offline  
Old January 27, 2024, 07:46 AM   #3
bac1023
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2008
Posts: 1,113
If it was during the 80’s it likely would not have been a 3rd gen model (4 digits)
bac1023 is offline  
Old January 27, 2024, 08:25 AM   #4
jar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2001
Location: Deep South Texas
Posts: 1,699
But still likely part of the 39 family.
__________________
To be vintage it's gotta be older than me!
jar is offline  
Old January 27, 2024, 11:59 AM   #5
RickB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,521
439 (blued, aluminum frame), 539 (same, in nickel), 639 (all stainless).
The Colt Commander and S&W 39 were competitors for a contract to replace the M1911A1, and when Uncle Sam balked, both guns were offered on the commercial market.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg twins.jpg (89.5 KB, 75 views)
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong.

Last edited by RickB; January 27, 2024 at 12:10 PM.
RickB is offline  
Old January 27, 2024, 12:59 PM   #6
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,365
digits

And before the 3-digit models, the original Model 39 was offered. I saw new Model 39's for sale into the early '80's.
bamaranger is offline  
Old January 27, 2024, 01:25 PM   #7
rc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 1,801
I would look for one of the older model 39 with the stainless receiver as a shooter. I like this model but getting one in CA would be a legal challenge. I feel so safe

https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1032917480
rc is offline  
Old January 27, 2024, 03:23 PM   #8
105kw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 30, 2017
Location: Columbia Basin Washington
Posts: 421
Because any information can be of value.
The Model 39 was built until 1982.
The second generation of the 439, 539, and 639, were built from 1979, until 1988. With the 539 only from 1980 until 1983.
The third generation, models 3904, and 3906 were built 1988 to 1990.
Info from Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson.
105kw is offline  
Old January 27, 2024, 03:35 PM   #9
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,223
Sounds like my model39, I regret selling mine as well.
jetinteriorguy is online now  
Old January 27, 2024, 04:12 PM   #10
Sevens
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,758
Quote:
Back in the 80's I had a smith and wesson 9mm single stack I think 8 rds magazine with adjustable sights, very accurate piece, had to sell it. I dont remember the model but I would really like another 1, the one thing I do remember was that it wouldnt fire without the Magazine in it..Just looking for the model number so I can search for another 1. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated..
If we go by simple statistical probability, based on the information you provided, you are looking for a Smith & Wesson Model 39-2.

I say this because you owned it in the 1980's. You did not say that it was manufactured in the 1980's but that is when you owned it.

For sure, S&W made lots and lots of 439's and 639's and some 539's and they made 3906 and 3904 also, but they made over 347,000 examples of the Model 39-2.

It was a single stack 9mm with a magazine that held 8 rounds, had adjustable sights and also had a magazine disconnect safety.

Without any other information... a 39-2 is what you likely owned.

Did it look like this?
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...AQMygXegQIARBf
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss.
Sevens is offline  
Old January 27, 2024, 06:01 PM   #11
gwpercle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 1,767
Look at model 39's .
The Baton Rouge Louisiana Police Dept. went to the model 39 when the 9mm semi-auto became the rage . The officers liked the magazine disconnect ... push the magazine release button and the gun was disabled ... the Bad Guy could take it away but by hitting the button , he couldn't fire the gun ... or at least that was the thinking at that time .

I wished I had one now ... a rather nice shooter ... it fit my hand well .
Gary
gwpercle is offline  
Old January 28, 2024, 11:38 AM   #12
ballardw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 1,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwpercle View Post
Look at model 39's .
The officers liked the magazine disconnect ... push the magazine release button and the gun was disabled ... the Bad Guy could take it away but by hitting the button , he couldn't fire the gun ... or at least that was the thinking at that time .

Gary
I've seen this "push the magazine release" thing before. I always wondered what else was going on that hitting the release was the optimal choice.
__________________
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
All data is flawed, some just less so.
ballardw is offline  
Old January 29, 2024, 01:07 AM   #13
rc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 1,801
the 59 series had the same magazine disconnect and probably the same slide as the 39 series guns with the double column magazine and fatter grip.
rc is offline  
Old January 29, 2024, 11:44 AM   #14
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,150
The 659's (stainless version) are rock-solid guns. I've had mine for decades. Used to shoot it quite a lot. Prices have stayed down on these as well.

15,000 years from now, there will be 2 pistols that survive: Glock 17's, S&W 659's. I would include the Ruger P89's as well, but after 11,000 years the aluminum becomes prone to corrosion.
Skans is offline  
Old January 30, 2024, 11:40 AM   #15
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,365
remember

Consider that prior 1982, there were not a lot of 9mm choices in the US. The 1911 came in 9mm, the Browning HP, perhaps a P38 or a Luger. But there were just not a lot of options for anything else. The wave of euro and DA pistols had not occurred. There was no Glock.

The M39 and M59 were available domestic offerings and available. Truth be told, the 9mm ctg was not all that popular!
bamaranger is offline  
Old January 30, 2024, 02:18 PM   #16
Sevens
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,758
^^This is true and I only base my opinions on what I’ve read from digging back in old gun magazines of the day. And before the internet and gun forums started rolling in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s, the gun periodicals -WERE- the pulse of the industry.

Outside of the Government Model, centerfire semiautomatic handguns were generally not all that popular for serious use. Exceptions were limited. Serious handgunners were using .45cal Colts (and a few others) or they were toting revolvers.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss.
Sevens is offline  
Old January 31, 2024, 06:24 PM   #17
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,223
Growing up in NoDak in the 60’s/70’s I never knew a single person that had a pistol. Typical armory would be a .22 rifle, a shotgun, and a high power rifle or two. Our only concern was hunting and you were pretty well covered by these three.
jetinteriorguy is online now  
Old January 31, 2024, 08:00 PM   #18
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,830
Quote:
I always wondered what else was going on that hitting the release was the optimal choice.
A surprising number of cops over the years have been shot/killed with their own gun when they were overpowered trying to arrest someone. There are also a surprising number of accidental shootings by people who drop the magazine thinking they've unloaded the gun and don't think about the one in the chamber.

The BHP which came out in the 1930 had a mag disconnect and many others followed this design. And there are a few documented cases where it saved a cops life.

That trend has changed, most newer guns don't have that feature.
__________________
"If you're still doing things the same way you were doing them 10 years ago, you're doing it wrong"

Winston Churchill
jmr40 is offline  
Old January 31, 2024, 09:31 PM   #19
Pumpkin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2020
Location: Seguin Texas
Posts: 503
Today the bad guy doesn’t even need to look for a safety in most cases.
Pumpkin is online now  
Old February 1, 2024, 02:12 PM   #20
SIGSHR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 4,700
The 2nd generation-3 digit model numbers-came with either a "fixed" rear sight-windage adjustment only-or a fully adjustable rear sight with protective ears. I have the 639 and 659, just bought fixed sight slides for them. I prefer steel frames for shooting comfort.
The slides for the 3rd generation-4 digit model numbers- do NOT fit on the 2nd generation, a shooting buddy just bought one, harhar.

Last edited by SIGSHR; February 1, 2024 at 02:29 PM.
SIGSHR is offline  
Old February 2, 2024, 06:24 PM   #21
Drm50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 10, 2014
Posts: 1,392
I’ve had several m39 S&Ws. In fact I just a few hours ago picked up a mint specimen in the box with docs and extra mag. The first one I had was bought same day with a Colt 1911 Commander and a Browning HP by my old man with my check book. I was out of country at time and wanted him to send me a good 9mm pistol. When I got home I tried them out. Actually the HP was a little more accurate but the tiny sights didn’t bring it out unless shooting rested. The Colt was last on accuracy totem pole. The 39 was just right.
Nice sight picture, decent trigger , DA just all round all purpose shooter.
* this is first gun I destroyed being young and dumb. Beat it up firing French 9mm meant for SMGs.
* The magazine disconnect in Browning HP was a set requirement by French Army who were shopping for new pistol.
Drm50 is offline  
Old February 4, 2024, 11:54 AM   #22
NHSHOOTER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2012
Location: Concord NH
Posts: 1,002
Sevens and all you others that have offered me insight, much appreciated, I am going to keep looking and try to find one at a decent price, I really liked that piece and financial hardship forced me to sell it, Thanks again for all your help..
NHSHOOTER is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08643 seconds with 8 queries